i picked canelo to beat him but he didnt so im not sure what you are talking about. he got a draw but he got a draw against floyd so the judges don't know sh-it. what else is new. if they fight again all odds point to a canelo victory thats why its better to juts move on and see different fights. if ggg gets robbed again you will pretend he didnt so as far as legacy goes it doesnt matter. for money sure but i dont care bout money i juts like seeing fights and i want to see different fights.
didnt the gggroupies insist lemieux beats up canelo...
Collapse
-
unless ggg ko'd canelo(which is very hard given the safetty first way he fights) this guy will always pretend canelo deserved to win or get a draw simply because the corrupt judges said so. thats why its pointless for teh fight to happen. already saw it. already saw ggg win. i dont ever see the official judges giving him the win though so lets move on.I have a huge problem with that since Golovkin got robbed by the judges which is going to cost him millions of dollars. Under your scenario Canelo gets to fight Lemieux for big money and Golovkin fights Charlo for peanuts. Golovkin already lost leverage for the rematch by that asinine decision and now you want him to get screwed over again. Your off your rocker ...Comment
-
Who said this? Show quotes.lets be real golovkinites...try to be real with yourselves and the rest of us for once
you said lemiuex would destroy canelo...so lets see if he gets by saunders if he can handle that
and we will see if golovkin can handle a young, talented, lion like jermall...and then yall can meet again?
or does that scare you?Comment
-
Comment
Comment