Parker......lol. Yep, keep ducking Wilder. I can't wait till this hype job get enough courage to face the Bronze Bomber.
Comments Thread For: Parker Will Face Joshua Next - If Offer Gets "Substantial" Increase
Collapse
-
40% crazy talk no chance hes getting close to that him and wilder need to build there own names u.s market isnt needed by joshua he shouldnt go down them roads uk is were to be in heavyweight division now until a great american heavyweight comes threw like ali holyfeild tyson again dont think there gona be any real intetest from america cos wilder aint thatNah while Parker holds the belt , his value can only increase, he fought 2 runners, Hughie would make anyone look bad.
80/20 is a joke, Parker has beaten some good fighters, not easily but he's won, he's not as box office but 20% from Hearn is just saying I'm scared
Should be more like 60/40 in Joshua's favour
But like I said Parker's value can only increase the longer he has the belt and after 2 runners in succession, no reason for him to take 20% now.
He doesn't need to fight mando now so he should get an impressive win under the belt against a fringer and come back to the table after Wilder-Joshua .
I'm sure they want to be undisputed vs Wilder not Parker as it's the WBC belt and has US potential to be really big finale to unification.Comment
-
AJ and Hearn will duck Parker and Wilder by pricing themselves out and delysionao fans will have yhere back which causes the sport to stagnantComment
-
70-30 is fair but Parker's camp is crazy if they are pushing for 50-50. It's simply not going to happen.Comment
-
Nah while Parker holds the belt , his value can only increase, he fought 2 runners, Hughie would make anyone look bad.
80/20 is a joke, Parker has beaten some good fighters, not easily but he's won, he's not as box office but 20% from Hearn is just saying I'm scared
Should be more like 60/40 in Joshua's favour
But like I said Parker's value can only increase the longer he has the belt and after 2 runners in succession, no reason for him to take 20% now.
He doesn't need to fight mando now so he should get an impressive win under the belt against a fringer and come back to the table after Wilder-Joshua .
I'm sure they want to be undisputed vs Wilder not Parker as it's the WBC belt and has US potential to be really big finale to unification.
excellent post !
I think 30-35% is fair..... he should go for 35, but settle for 30
Joshua is waaaay bigger than Parker, and he is a phenomenal opportunity
but if they won't pay him now, they can pay him laterComment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
I agree with aboutfkntime but I think he should get more than 30% as a proper belt holder , sure Joshua is box office but share the love and make the fight
65/35 imo no less
Parker can let them come to him, I'm sure if he keeps winning in semi obscurity his value will only creep up , just don't lose to anyone good ��
I think Parker matches up quite well vs Joshua and yeah now's a good time as any but the money should be right, he's not gonna go down in value unless ruins the whole thing by losing to some WBO bumComment
-
80/20 is what Pulev was gonna get , who's just a bad looking dude with a badass name but has a no better resume than Parker and no belt and I don't see he's that big of a draw, maybe in Russia and I guess in bulgaria but there's probably only like 3 TVs there
He has a lot of past it guys on his record, split decision vs Chisora and he beat Ustinov who is a giant girls blouse
Parker should start at 70/30 and aim for 60/40 if he gets the KO factor back.
At the end of the day they both have equal belts (I don't count ibo but I guess you have to) and only box office separates them but if you want the belt , share the love a little
I think Parker is more dangerous than Pulev who is rangier than Parker but less aggressive and fast and I think Parker much more dangerous at close range , both guys have similar power and durability maybe a slight edge to Parker on both
Pulevs a good boxer but Parker can be fast and dangerous if he gets in rangeLast edited by Flabble Scrote; 10-30-2017, 11:05 PM.Comment
Comment