Comments Thread For: Wilder To Hearn: Put Joshua in Package - Then I'll Fight Whyte!

[RedPath]

Casuals and fan boys argue about A-side and negotiations, real boxing fans argue about boxing.

Seriously? That's the sort of comment a 12 year old would make.

[ShoulderRoll]

I think Hearn knows he can get more money by letting AJ Ko a few more guys before he Ko's Bummy squad.

If Hearn let's AJ Ko bum squad I think people will loose interest in other AJ fights cause they see this fight as a culmination of fights in 2018.

I disagree.

If Joshua unified all the belts there would be even more interest in him. That's something that Klitschko never did.

[eco1]

I disagree.

If Joshua unified all the belts there would be even more interest in him. That's something that Klitschko never did.

maybe, but bum squad is not the guy to beat AJ.

And believe me, I don't think any higher about either of them.

[RedPath]

Yeah, pretty sure you're 110% incorrect. First of all Wilder has not once specified the details of the agreement, so what you're portraying as truth is virtually bull-schit. Based on Wilders bantor, in which he indicates he would defeat Whyte quite easily, it is inferred that AJ would be guaranteed as his next opponent once he defeats Whyte. I fully believe that everyone other than AJ fanboy posse, understands what Wilder is asking for.

If Wilder were to agree to the winner of him v Whyte proceeding to fight AJ, Hearn would sign him in a heartbeat. That's the perfect scenario for them to build to a summer unification fight. If Wilder wins, he's had the exposure, and Wembley fills with 90k fans again. If Whyte wins, the fight is worth even more as it would be a unification of the three main belts between two Brits. So no, Wilder doesn't want any of that downside.

[methodcal]

Seriously? That's the sort of comment a 12 year old would make.

Your response is more like it homie.

[ShoulderRoll]

maybe, but bum squad is not the guy to beat AJ.

That's your opinion. Not a fact.

In order to find out for sure they have to fight. I don't get why the Joshua fans are so against it happening.

[RedPath]

Your response is more like it homie.

I'm not the one trying to shut down reasoned discussion with such an infantile remark. Homie.

[eco1]

That's your opinion. Not a fact.

In order to find out for sure they have to fight. I don't get why the Joshua fans are so against it happening.

yes, it is my opinion, I guess we will just have to wait and see.

[KnickTillDeaTh]

Seriously? That's the sort of comment a 12 year old would make.

Really? Why cut out the rest of the post? Im going to guess because you have little to no actual boxing knowledge. As I said, it's very easy to point out the casuals and the fanboys on this site. Which are you?

[KnickTillDeaTh]

If Wilder were to agree to the winner of him v Whyte proceeding to fight AJ, Hearn would sign him in a heartbeat. That's the perfect scenario for them to build to a summer unification fight. If Wilder wins, he's had the exposure, and Wembley fills with 90k fans again. If Whyte wins, the fight is worth even more as it would be a unification of the three main belts between two Brits. So no, Wilder doesn't want any of that downside.

I'll play for a little. Show me where in any of Wilder's comments where he specifically says he gets an AJ fight win or lose. Please post the link. Or admit it's your opinion.