Since when does a title holder have to earn the right to fight another title holder?
Collapse
-
AJ and Wilder should fight. Wilder should not have to do anything to earn a shot at Aj. AJ and Wilder are clearly the two best heavyweights in the world and they should fight to see who is number one right after they KO their current opponents. AJ is clearly the A side and if Wilder really wants the fight he should expect to come to England and not expect to make as much money as AJ. AJ is the cash cow and Wilder needs him much more than he needs Wilder.Comment
-
You seem confused... VADA catches them and it's the WBC that 'turns the other way', though I suppose that doesn't help your 'Joshua is a juicer' rhetoric.
FYI it's the WBA that have suspended Luis Ortiz whilst the WBC are yet to. That same WBC still had Stiverne scheduled to fight Povetkin in a WBC final eliminator even though he had PEDs in his system too.Comment
-
LMAO. More people know why Holyfield is compared to Wilder.Comment
-
I have a better question for you....since when does a Champion (Golovkin) have to earn the right to fight the #1 contender? (Canelo)
This sport has gone to hell. Simple as that.Comment
-
Big difference. Besides being a fellow belt holder, Wilder is viewed as one of the top two heavyweights in the world. No one without an agenda believes Saunders is a better fighter than Charlo, Jacobs or Canelo.Comment
-
Boxing is about money. Why would team Wilder go through the time and expense to work up an offer for a fight that team Joshua has made clear they don't want right now.Comment
-
Comment
Comment