A lot of cats from my generation say well you got to beat the champ when a fight is close.
Meaning, you got to whup that asś to get the win. Getting the win just isn't enough, you need to do more than that.
For example, well that was a close round but the challenger landed the cleaner punches and stopped the champ in his tracks once or twice that round. Nope, not enough cuz you can't have close rounds with the champ, champ wins those cuz he's champ.
I used to regurgitate this when I was a kid --- mostly when telling people Hagler really beat Leonard and got robbed (which I now believe SRL won handily).
As I got older and wiser I started critically thinking about the concept.
Basically what these people are saying is the champ gets more points or something in a championship bout.
Nah man, the champ can lose it close. All you need to do is win the round. Champ don'tget shít if he doesn't earn it and getting a belt doesn't give you imaginary points.
You got to beat the champ is a myth.
Meaning, you got to whup that asś to get the win. Getting the win just isn't enough, you need to do more than that.
For example, well that was a close round but the challenger landed the cleaner punches and stopped the champ in his tracks once or twice that round. Nope, not enough cuz you can't have close rounds with the champ, champ wins those cuz he's champ.
I used to regurgitate this when I was a kid --- mostly when telling people Hagler really beat Leonard and got robbed (which I now believe SRL won handily).
As I got older and wiser I started critically thinking about the concept.
Basically what these people are saying is the champ gets more points or something in a championship bout.
Nah man, the champ can lose it close. All you need to do is win the round. Champ don'tget shít if he doesn't earn it and getting a belt doesn't give you imaginary points.
You got to beat the champ is a myth.
Comment