Ratings for PBC on FOX and Showtime 1.4M & 442K

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • MasterPlan
    Undisputed Champion
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Apr 2014
    • 6386
    • 180
    • 1
    • 57,678

    #21
    Originally posted by WBC WBA IBF
    And CBS and Viacom are both owned by National Amusements.

    So again, Spike and CBS are part of the same company. Spike got rid of boxing because the channel is being completely overhauled and rebranded.
    Bellator is still there tho. Is Bellator leaving too? Bellator has not only MMA but Kickboxing also.

    And while both are under NA they (CBS and Viacom) are seperate en****** if that makes any sense.

    Comment

    • Thetruthiserrol
      Contender
      Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
      • May 2017
      • 298
      • 11
      • 1
      • 9,585

      #22
      Hmmm. The FOX ratings aren't that terrible in my view.

      If we look at the last 6 UFC on FOX events, they averaged 2.125M viewers. The last 6 PBC on FOX events averaged 1.56M viewers.

      Note that UFC are in process of negotiating a TV deal, and are asking for around 450 million dollars per year. They currently get 90-100 million dollars per year. If FOX miss out on UFC, they could definitely fill up their empty slots with more PBC cards imo.

      Comment

      • N/A
        Undisputed Champion
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Jul 2017
        • 9269
        • 214
        • 0
        • 12

        #23
        Originally posted by MasterPlan
        Bellator is still there tho. Is Bellator leaving too? Bellator has not only MMA but Kickboxing also.
        no because they own bellator.

        but they added boxing to take spike in a sports direction.

        then it was decided to revamp as the paramount network and focus on movies to attract female viewers.

        which meant reducing the amount of sports.

        so of course they got rid of what they didnt own and kept what they did own.

        Comment

        • MasterPlan
          Undisputed Champion
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Apr 2014
          • 6386
          • 180
          • 1
          • 57,678

          #24
          Originally posted by WBC WBA IBF
          no because they own bellator.

          but they added boxing to take spike in a sports direction.

          then it was decided to revamp as the paramount network and focus on movies to attract female viewers.

          which meant reducing the amount of sports.

          so of course they got rid of what they didnt own and kept what they did own.
          Who owns Bellator?

          Comment

          • N/A
            Undisputed Champion
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Jul 2017
            • 9269
            • 214
            • 0
            • 12

            #25
            Originally posted by MasterPlan
            Who owns Bellator?
            national amusements

            Comment

            • MasterPlan
              Undisputed Champion
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Apr 2014
              • 6386
              • 180
              • 1
              • 57,678

              #26
              Originally posted by WBC WBA IBF
              national amusements
              Viacom own Bellator but CBS-SHO is invested in boxing so why get rid of it over at Spike? Or Paramount Television which is what it will be rebranded as.

              Comment

              • N/A
                Undisputed Champion
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Jul 2017
                • 9269
                • 214
                • 0
                • 12

                #27
                Originally posted by MasterPlan
                Viacom own Bellator but CBS-SHO is invested in boxing so why get rid of it over at Spike? Or Paramount Television which is what it will be rebranded as.
                youre not making any sense.

                national amusements owns dozens of channels. why would one keep boxing just because another has boxing?

                Comment

                • MasterPlan
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Apr 2014
                  • 6386
                  • 180
                  • 1
                  • 57,678

                  #28
                  Originally posted by WBC WBA IBF
                  youre not making any sense.

                  national amusements owns dozens of channels. why would one keep boxing just because another has boxing?
                  It's makes total sense. Boxing-MMA-kickboxing.

                  Comment

                  • N/A
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Jul 2017
                    • 9269
                    • 214
                    • 0
                    • 12

                    #29
                    Originally posted by MasterPlan
                    It's makes total sense. Boxing-MMA-kickboxing.
                    but they dont want to be a male oriented violence driven network anymore.

                    they want to go after females with scripted dramas and milk their film library to cut costs. the paramount network is going to focus on movies they already own and going after female viewers. they dont want to be a male focused combat sports destination anymore.

                    the only thing that saved bellator was the fact that they already owned it. the paramount network is for movies they own, the fight league they own, and some of the savings spent on original dramas to go after women.

                    spike got rid of boxing because spike isnt going to exist anymore.

                    Comment

                    • MasterPlan
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                      • Apr 2014
                      • 6386
                      • 180
                      • 1
                      • 57,678

                      #30
                      Originally posted by WBC WBA IBF
                      but they dont want to be a male oriented violence driven network anymore.

                      they want to go after females with scripted dramas and milk their film library to cut costs. the paramount network is going to focus on movies they already own and going after female viewers. they dont want to be a male focused combat sports destination anymore.

                      the only thing that saved bellator was the fact that they already owned it. the paramount network is for movies they own, the fight league they own, and some of the savings spent on original dramas to go after women.

                      spike got rid of boxing because spike isnt going to exist anymore.
                      I get what you're saying bit if you're gonna keep Bellator around why not boxing
                      Unless they plan on moving to another Viacom network like MTV

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP