Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Who is the favourite (Rigondeaux vs. Lomachenko)

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #11
    Originally posted by A.K View Post
    I bet you don't even know rigo real record chump
    You a weirdo aren't you. When people don't agree with you, you always resort to calling them ****. Says a lot about you. Just a rookie **** poster.

    Comment


    • #12
      Originally posted by Scary View Post
      You a weirdo aren't you. When people don't agree with you, you always resort to calling them ****. Says a lot about you. Just a rookie **** poster.
      More like the hypocrite came out in YOU I replied and you didn't agree and had a period.

      Comment


      • #13
        Not sure what you mean by he's proven time and time again. Dude have like 20 something career fights and their is only one name on his resume who is the definition of a hypejob.

        Loma by ko. Dude is younger, bigger, and honestly just overall more skilled then rigo. Rigo isn't going to win waiting on counters all day.

        Comment


        • #14
          Loma should be the favorite. A good bigger man almost always beats a good smaller man.

          Comment


          • #15
            Originally posted by Scary View Post
            I've just been looking at the odds, and it's showing that Lomachenko is a big favourite.

            I'm getting my money back 4.5 times on a win for the Jackal. In my mind this is absolute bank robbery of a bet. How can Rigondeuax be such a big underdog, when he is proven time and time again.

            Vasyl is 29 years old. Rigondeaux is 36. But still.

            We're also seeing David Haye being the big favourite against Tony Bellew - Interestingly enough.

            What is your thought on these kinds of odds?
            Dont bet with money. A) this fight may be very hard to judge and folks and judges may see two different fights rewarding one guy for offence or the other one for defense, B) a bad decision is very possible, C) someone could get cut which means the better fighter could lose even though they were better, just because of a cut. TOO many variables. If you want to be on anything, bet on a draw or majority decision if you have to pick one guy.

            Comment


            • #16
              I thought Broner being a 5-1 underdog was kinda crazy, but odds makers thought right.

              Comment


              • #17
                Originally posted by Scary View Post
                Who is the favourite (Rigondeaux vs. Lomachenko)

                I've just been looking at the odds, and it's showing that Lomachenko is a big favourite.

                I'm getting my money back 4.5 times on a win for the Jackal. In my mind this is absolute bank robbery of a bet. How can Rigondeuax be such a big underdog, when he is proven time and time again.

                Vasyl is 29 years old. Rigondeaux is 36. But still.

                We're also seeing David Haye being the big favourite against Tony Bellew - Interestingly enough.

                What is your thought on these kinds of odds?
                ... of course Lomachenko is the favorite...

                ... but I'm still rooting for Rigo!!!...

                Comment


                • #18
                  Originally posted by richardt View Post
                  Dont bet with money. A) this fight may be very hard to judge and folks and judges may see two different fights rewarding one guy for offence or the other one for defense, B) a bad decision is very possible, C) someone could get cut which means the better fighter could lose even though they were better, just because of a cut. TOO many variables. If you want to be on anything, bet on a draw or majority decision if you have to pick one guy.
                  I agree with you that generally it's really a grey zone with this whole boxing betting, because so many different puppetmasters pulling strings all over the spectrum. But still, I've been winning more than I've been losing and I usually bet safe which means I cover my own bets by betting against myself, so that if I'm wrong I'm still winning more than I'm betting.

                  I just feel like everyone has been avoding Rigo for so long, last time any P4P material guy stepped in against him, he got outclassed - And we must remember that the filipino flash was also the bigger man - Little did it matter.

                  Rigo always looks like a million bucks, seems like everyone has forgotten how avoided this man has been his whole career.

                  Comment


                  • #19
                    Originally posted by RetroSpeed05 View Post
                    I thought Broner being a 5-1 underdog was kinda crazy, but odds makers thought right.
                    I was quite certain that Broner would be up against a nightmare style for him. Ala Maidana.

                    Comment


                    • #20
                      Ive made a small bet on Rigo, those odds are just too good to pass up
                      I bet on Broner too but I have a lot more confidence in Rigo to pull the upset

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP