golovkin has impeccable timing

[stealthradon]

My point is there's no fear of Golovkin overshadowing Mayweather. To be honest I don't even see him overshadowing Hopkins unless he plans on moving up to LHW and winning a championship. We know that won't happen.

Hatton was a poor example btw. I mean they both stopped him so what's your point?

He has already overshadowed Hopkins when it comes to title defenses.

[daggum]

yes for sure great post. ggg is ducking charlo because hes fighting canelo in a rematch and then hes fighting khan because you say so. he ducked before he even had the chance to duck

[LetOutTheCage]

and im not talking about his punches

its no coincidence that the golovkin camp made comments about the fights coming to them now after canelo....

they are now more likely to enter a circus/farce money fight than they are to fight a charlo brother or rematch jacobs....

golovkin vs amir khan wouldnt suprise me anymore......i used to think jermall was clearly the better charlo...and i still think he might be better...but its not so clear anymore

thats charlo x2 problems for golovkin....the world/media should be demanding he face one of these guys the same way they demanded canelo fight golovkin.....they should be putting pressure on him but they wont put pressure on the media/hbo darling

no way golovkin survives a canelo rematch/jacobs rematch/fight with a charlo and comes out with that 0 in tact

and his team knows this....watch the swerve

Looool the same people claiming GGG needed to prove himself before he fights Canelo are the same ones demanding that he fights one of the Charlo's. They have literally proven nothing so far and your making out like they are avoided by GGG.

Jacobs, Canelo and GGG destroy the Charlo's. They should stop ducking Andrade.

[soul_survivor]

Actually you brought him up but that's ok. You didn't have a point anyway.

I didn't bring him up, someone else did, who replied to me and if you read what was said, you would understand the point.

You clown.

[HarvardBlue]

I didn't bring him up, someone else did, who replied to me and if you read what was said, you would understand the point.

You clown.

Ok so his name came up and you agreed so I responded to you. Then you came back with that lame response about Hatton. Now you're fresh out of responses and wondering why I am comparing him Golovkin? Way to deflect when you have no argument.

[soul_survivor]

Ok so his name came up and you agreed so I responded to you. Then you came back with that lame response about Hatton. Now you're fresh out of responses and wondering why I am comparing him Golovkin? Way to deflect when you have no argument.

I'm not fresh out of responses but there's nothing to respond to. I asked you why you're comparing him to GGG, what I responded to was not GGG v Floyd at all. Maybe English is difficult for you to understand, I dont know

[HarvardBlue]

Because he doesn't want Golovkin to fight Saunders and potentially unify the title. He doesn't want Golovkin to overshadow Hopkins and or Floyd. I'm not sure if it's one of them or both that puts a bee in his bonnet.

Well, he is one of the "usuals" so I'm sure its both but mainly Floyd.

I'm not fresh out of responses but there's nothing to respond to. I asked you why you're comparing him to GGG, what I responded to was not GGG v Floyd at all. Maybe English is difficult for you to understand, I dont know

I let you read this and maybe you figure out why we're even having the conversation in the first place. I don't have time to quote everything that was said but this will get you started. If you have problems with any of the words just google it or better yet just interpret it as you see fit. Oh, then there was the Hatton/Pacquiao/Mayweather comparison.

Dude just let it go.

[soul_survivor]

I let you read this and maybe you figure out why we're even having the conversation in the first place. I don't have time to quote everything that was said but this will get you started. If you have problems with any of the words just google it or better yet just interpret it as you see fit. Oh, then there was the Hatton/Pacquiao/Mayweather comparison.

Dude just let it go.

Yes, can you see wheer I wrote a comparison between the two? I was talking abut certain posters, that I label the "usuals" who will not give credi to certain other fighters.

At no point did I bring up GGGs performancesi n comparison to lil boy floy.

[Kigali]

Looool the same people claiming GGG needed to prove himself before he fights Canelo are the same ones demanding that he fights one of the Charlo's. They have literally proven nothing so far and your making out like they are avoided by GGG.

Jacobs, Canelo and GGG destroy the Charlo's. They should stop ducking Andrade.

You're talking out your ass like a typical Brit.

Canelo ducked BOTH Charlos at 154.

Those guys had TITLES...and Canelito still didn't go near them....for damn good reason.

The Charlos are too much for Jacobs....GGG....and especially Canelito.

[HarvardBlue]

Yes, can you see wheer I wrote a comparison between the two? I was talking abut certain posters, that I label the "usuals" who will not give credi to certain other fighters.

At no point did I bring up GGGs performancesi n comparison to lil boy floy.

You agreed with the dude who said certain posters didn't want Golovkin to overshadow Mayweather. I was trying to tell you there's no issue with that because at this point they're not even on the same level in terms of accomplishment. That's the reason I gave the comparison. You're obviously not a fan of Mayweather and that's ok. But he was nowhere apart of this conversation until the other guy brought him up and you agreed... All in an effort to dismiss a perceived issue with Golovkin.

You can't make a claim about other posters not giving credit when you're just as guilty as anyone else on here. Except when it's a fighter you support (or a fan favorite), then everyone else has to be on board or else. Makes no sense at all.