Here's Where All The Floyd Cheat Theories Fail

[WesternChamp]

notice how im still here. if he really did win the bet, i would be gone already because his snitch ass woulda went and told the mod.

[WesternChamp]

travesty playing dumb --

"i didnt know you were talking about the OT in here", LOL!!!!

notice how he tries to spin it by saying "who has the most post count wins". if he didnt know i was still talking about the OT, why would he say that then? LOL!!!

[travestyny]

notice how im still here. if he really did win the bet, i would be gone already because his snitch ass woulda went and told the mod.

ADP02 LOST OUR THUNDERDOME BATTLE AND NEVER PAID ME THE POINTS THAT WERE DUE.

TAKE PRIDE IN THE FACT THAT YOU PACROACHES HAVE NO HONOR. The **** would a Mod do about it, you butthurt f@g.

It's like you've attached yourself to my ball hair. You little flea. I told you, if you don't accept your ban, you go in the iggy box for 5 days. You served one day because you were too embarrassed to come around, so that's 4 days now.

Owning you was fun, and I know I've ruined your life and that does make me feel happy, I must admit. But once the fight has been beaten out of an opponent, it's no longer worth it.

Accept your ban, or in the box you go.

[travestyny]

travesty playing dumb --

"i didnt know you were talking about the OT in here", LOL!!!!

notice how he tries to spin it by saying "who has the most post count wins". if he didnt know i was still talking about the OT, why would he say that then? LOL!!!

Notice how you keep talking about me over and over and over again.


Your time is up. Sorry, son. In the box you go

[koolkc107]

why the name calling when it had nothing to do with you? showing travesty traits is all im saying.

i already answered your question last week, and look at you trying to deflect this by saying you asked me a question and i wouldnt answer so why should you answer mines?

because your question had nothing to do with me at hand! where as with you, what im asking you, it actually came from you! let that sink in einstein!

FAIL

You are showing your idiocy every time you post now.

As to the green, this is my thread.
You post in it, it's fair game to anyone- ESPECIALLY ME, THE GUY THAT STARTED IT.

And you are contradicting yourself constantly; this time you did it within a few sentences.

Look at the brown.
First you are saying you answered my question, which is a lie.
Then, a sentence later you are explaining why you DIDN'T answer my question, with a lame excuse that reeks of desperation.

You are in this thread trying to refute the OP.
The question I am asking is valid if your take is that Floyd cheated, since what Mayweather did was first published May 2015.

Now, you can be a man and answer truthfully, or continue doing what you have been doing for hundreds of posts now.

But, you know what?

Your lack of an answer is also an answer to another thing.
And that answer equals your credibility being shot here.

Not too late...

DID YOU OR DID YOU NOT HAVE ANYTHING TO SAY IN MAY 2015 WHEN KEVIN IOLE REPORTED THE IVs AND THE RETROACTIVE TUE?

[Shape up]

FAIL

You are showing your idiocy every time you post now.

As to the green, this is my thread.
You post in it, it's fair game to anyone- ESPECIALLY ME, THE GUY THAT STARTED IT.

And you are contradicting yourself constantly; this time you did it within a few sentences.

Look at the brown.
First you are saying you answered my question, which is a lie.
Then, a sentence later you are explaining why you DIDN'T answer my question, with a lame excuse that reeks of desperation.

You are in this thread trying to refute the OP.
The question I am asking is valid if your take is that Floyd cheated, since what Mayweather did was first published May 2015.

Now, you can be a man and answer truthfully, or continue doing what you have been doing for hundreds of posts now.

But, you know what?

Your lack of an answer is also an answer to another thing.
And that answer equals your credibility being shot here.

Not too late...

DID YOU OR DID YOU NOT HAVE ANYTHING TO SAY IN MAY 2015 WHEN KEVIN IOLE REPORTED THE IVs AND THE RETROACTIVE TUE?

When are you circus animals going to answer the hard questions, you know the ones you try to bluff your way past, remember, no homevisits, substantive change, it must be monitored, man up gimps

[koolkc107]

When are you circus animals going to answer the hard questions, you know the ones you try to bluff your way past, remember, no homevisits, substantive change, it must be monitored, man up gimps

FAIL

All of those questions have been answered previously in this thread.

Here is one that remains unanswered, tho.

DID YOU OR DID YOU NOT HAVE ANYTHING TO SAY IN MAY 2015 WHEN KEVIN IOLE REPORTED THE IVs AND THE RETROACTIVE TUE?

[Shape up]

FAIL

All of those questions have been answered previously in this thread.

Here is one that remains unanswered, tho.

DID YOU OR DID YOU NOT HAVE ANYTHING TO SAY IN MAY 2015 WHEN KEVIN IOLE REPORTED THE IVs AND THE RETROACTIVE TUE?

You keep saying they've been answered but they haven't, your opinions don't count, hard facts count

[koolkc107]

You keep saying they've been answered but they haven't, your opinions don't count, hard facts count

FAIL

All of those questions have been answered previously in this thread.

Not my problem if you have reading comprehension issues.

Post #1654 is one of the latest of many posts that address your questions.

Read it.

No, better yet try to UNDERSTAND IT.

And don't forget to honestly answer this:

DID YOU OR DID YOU NOT HAVE ANYTHING TO SAY IN MAY 2015 WHEN KEVIN IOLE REPORTED THE IVs AND THE RETROACTIVE TUE?

[Shape up]

Point of clarification

It is clear that some folks are making arguments without understanding a few things.

I have posted the WADA code for retroactive TUEs several times in this thread.

Once should have been enough, but a thousand times will prove insufficient if posters don't read it, comprehend it, THEN attempt whatever rebuttals they are capable of framing.

First, let's understand that the phrase is Retroactive TUE

There is no such thing as an "emergency TUE". If there is, someone educate me and post a link from WADA where it says that.

The part of the code is posted below. I have taken the liberty of color coding parts for clarity.

Notice the words "or" throughout the section.

That little word is there for a reason.

It is saying unequivocally that ANY ONE OF THESE CIRCUMSTANCES CAN WARRANT THE GRANTING OF A TUE.

You don't need to satisfy ALL of them, just one of them.

So what does this mean?

I believe there was a real medical emergency.

I don't think it was life threatening, but it was sufficient for a medical professional to make a decision and it was also apparent to another professional in the room, the DCO, who was satisfied enough to let the process happen in his presence.

But here's the thing...a medical emergency is just ONE REASON TO GRANT A RETROACTIVE TUE.

Let me put that in plainer language so no one is confused.

IT DIDN'T HAVE TO BE AN EMERGENCY FOR A TUE TO BE GRANTED.

If Floyd satisfied ANY OF THE CONDITIONS, a TUE could be applied for and granted.

So for those of you arguing that it wasn't an emergency or that Floyd wasn't very dehydrated...IT DOESN'T MATTER!!!

Thanks for playing, kids.

For your perusal here's the WADA code on retroactive TUEs:

9. WHAT IS A RETROACTIVE TUE?

There are situations for which TUEs may be granted retroactively. The evaluation process is identical to the standard TUE application procedure i.e. the TUEC evaluates the application and issues its decision. The ISTUE stipulates which situations may result in the granting of a retroactive TUE, as follows:

Emergency treatment or treatment of an acute medical condition was necessary*; or

Due to other exceptional circumstances, there was insufficient time or opportunity for the athlete to submit, or the TUEC to consider, an application for the TUE prior to Sample collection; or

Applicable rules required the athlete or permitted the athlete to apply for a retroactive TUE. This is applicable to Persons who are not International-Level or National-Level athletes (Code Article 4.4.5) and (where the relevant NADO so chooses) to National-Level Athletes in sports specified by the relevant NADO (ISTUE Article 5.1 Comment); or

[Comment: Such athletes are strongly advised to have a medical file prepared and ready to demonstrate their satisfaction of the TUE conditions set out in ISTUE Article 4.1, should an application for a retroactive TUE be necessary following Sample collection.]

It is agreed, by WADA and by the ADO to whom the application for a retroactive TUE is or would be made, that fairness requires the grant of a retroactive TUE.

*A medical emergency or acute medical situation occurs when the athlete's medical condition justifies immediate Administration of a Prohibited Substance or Method and failure to treat immediately could significantly put the athlete’s health at risk. It is always preferable to address a TUE application prospectively rather than retrospectively. ADOs granting TUEs should have internal procedures to expedite the evaluation and granting of TUE for emergency situations, whenever possible, and without putting the athlete’s health at risk.

https://www.wada-ama.org/en/question...n-tue#item-734

Let's look at your quote, do you see the word MAY at the top, that means it could or could not be granted, whereas prohibited at ALL times means it couldn't be granted, when it says prohibited at all times, it doesn't say afterward "except in these circumstances" which means it's prohibited at ALL TIMES. Here is the rule---Some reports suggest that administration of IV infusions, including dietary supplement and vitamin ****tails, are being provided to athletes for recuperation, recovery or lifestyle reasons. This medical practice is prohibited at all times without prior TUE approval.see there is no except for this situation in this rule so your explaination is useless, you need to try harder jnr