Here's Where All The Floyd Cheat Theories Fail

[Dosumpthin]

That was a link to an interview by Travis Tygart (USADA) who explained that one can mask given 72 hours of advance notice down to 10 minutes notice. For 10 minutes notice he gave 2 examples. Whizzinator and catheter.

The interview was taken soon after Floyd/Manny tried to negotiate their fight initially.


People have used both techniques including athletes. You guys just like to DEFLECT from the main point that USADA's Tygart was trying to make and which Floyd could have done (ie. masked) given that he had a delay of 6+ hours. Memo Heredia being consulted may have helped.








Others use unknown or undetectable masking agents in various ways.






.




Actually, how about YOU? Can you take Tygarts quote in its entirety?


Do you think that Tygart meant that the only way that athletes have or can mask is by using whizzinator?


See how dumb your post was?

I even told you not to go there but you did!!!



.

The fact you are trying to apply a partial quote taken out of context 5 years before an IV under ABP testing and referencing athletes decades prior to support you conspiracy IS EXACTLY WHY THIS THREAD WAS CREATED.

Lol.


Insane.


Whizzinator. You tried to omit it. You got caught. Own it.

[Shape up]

• Last, the news that the passport is beatable is not, well, news. Remember that point that other organizations fund research? Another study, not directly funded by WADA, found much the same as the recent French study.

The researchers in the other study included several well-regarded scientists (led by Ashenden). They gave 10 subjects twice-weekly microdoses of EPO for 12 weeks. Similar to the French study, researchers found a 10 percent increase in total hemoglobin mass, which correlates strongly to aerobic capacity. Just as with the French study, researchers found that none of the 10 athletes’ profiles would have been flagged as abnormal by the software analysis—it would have taken expert human review to catch, a point that the researchers made in their conclusion. The study met the other standards WADA says the French study missed: It used passport guidelines and was published in a peer-reviewed journal (the European Journal of Applied Physiology). The publication date? September, 2011.

[koolkc107]

You were right with 1 thing, there is 4 criteria for granting a TUE BUT ALL 4 CRITERIA MUST BE MET

You are singlehandedly making me run out of synonyms for "******"

Post #1654 has the WADA code on retroactive TUEs reprinted verbatim, color coded for clarity, AND LINKED to the original from the WADA page.

so...

All of your questions have been answered before numerous times in this thread.

FAIL

I just need you to answer one truthfully and you seem to have a problem doing so.

DID YOU OR DID YOU NOT HAVE ANYTHING TO SAY IN MAY 2015 WHEN KEVIN IOLE REPORTED THE IVs AND THE RETROACTIVE TUE?

[Shape up]

You are singlehandedly making me run out of synonyms for "******"

Post #1654 has the WADA code on retroactive TUEs reprinted verbatim, color coded for clarity, AND LINKED to the original from the WADA page.

so...

All of your questions have been answered before numerous times in this thread.

FAIL

I just need you to answer one truthfully and you seem to have a problem doing so.

DID YOU OR DID YOU NOT HAVE ANYTHING TO SAY IN MAY 2015 WHEN KEVIN IOLE REPORTED THE IVs AND THE RETROACTIVE TUE?

2.0 Criteria for Granting a TUE
An Athlete may be granted a TUE if ( AND ONLY IF he/she can show that EACH of the
following conditions is met:
a. The Prohibited Substance or Prohibited Method in question is needed to treat an acute or chronic medical condition, such that the Athlete would experience a significant impairment to health if the Prohibited Substance or Prohibited Method were to be withheld (ISTUE Article 4.1(a)).
b. The The****utic Use of the Prohibited Substance or Prohibited Method is highly unlikely to produce any additional enhancement of performance beyond what might be anticipated by a return to the Athlete’s normal state of health following the treatment of the acute or chronic medical condition (ISTUE Article 4.1(b)).
Although there may be some enhancement of individual performance as a result of the efficacy of the treatment, nevertheless, such enhancement must not exceed the level of performance of the Athlete prior to the onset of his/her medical condition.
c. There is no reasonable The****utic alternative to the Use of the Prohibited Substance or Prohibited Method (ISTUE Article 4.1(c)).
Three points should be noted in relation to reasonable The****utic alternatives:
 Only valid and referenced medications are to be considered as alternatives.
 The definition of what is valid and referenced may vary from one country to another. These differences should be taken into account. For example, a medication may be registered in one country and not in another, or approval may be pending, etc.
 There may be instances where it is not medically appropriate to try the alternatives before Using the medication containing the Prohibited Substance. In these cases, the physician is to state why.
d. The necessity for the Use of the Prohibited Substance or Prohibited Method is not due, wholly or in part, to prior Use (without a TUE) of a substance or method that was prohibited at the time of such Use (ISTUE Article 4.1 d).
WADA documents titled “Medical Information to Support the Decisions of TUECs” (TUE Physician Guidelines) assist physicians and ADOs in applying these criteria to particular medical conditions. These documents are available on WADA’s Web site-------here is the required criteria for a TUE straight from WADA, each criteria has to be met you moron

[Shape up]

WHAT IS A RETROACTIVE TUE?

There are situations for which TUEs may be granted retroactively. The evaluation process is identical to the standard TUE application procedure i.e. the TUEC evaluates the application and issues its decision. The ISTUE stipulates which situations may result in the granting of a retroactive TUE, as follows:

Emergency treatment or treatment of an acute medical condition was necessary*; or

Due to other exceptional circumstances, there was insufficient time or opportunity for the athlete to submit, or the TUEC to consider, an application for the TUE prior to Sample collection; or

Applicable rules required the athlete or permitted the athlete to apply for a retroactive TUE. This is applicable to Persons who are not International-Level or National-Level athletes (Code Article 4.4.5) and (where the relevant NADO so chooses) to National-Level Athletes in sports specified by the relevant NADO (ISTUE Article 5.1 Comment); or

[Comment: Such athletes are strongly advised to have a medical file prepared and ready to demonstrate their satisfaction of the TUE conditions set out in ISTUE Article 4.1, should an application for a retroactive TUE be necessary following Sample collection.]

It is agreed, by WADA and by the ADO to whom the application for a retroactive TUE is or would be made, that fairness requires the grant of a retroactive TUE.

*A medical emergency or acute medical situation occurs when the athlete's medical condition justifies immediate Administration of a Prohibited Substance or Method and failure to treat immediately could significantly put the athlete’s health at risk. It is always preferable to address a TUE application prospectively rather than retrospectively. ADOs granting TUEs should have internal procedures to expedite the evaluation and granting of TUE for emergency situations, whenever possible, and without putting the athlete’s health at risk.-----------------------so this is your post, where does it mention what criteria has to be met gimp, oh, it doesn't, it says what reasons it can be issued for, not the requirement to issue it, they are completely different gimp, your very much an amateur

[koolkc107]

All of your questions have been answered before numerous times in this thread.

Post #1654 explains why Mayweather was able to apply for and be granted a retroactive TUE.

All he needed was to fit one of those 4 criteria in the WADA code for RETROACTIVE TUEs

No emergency needed. No severe dehydration either.

You are done here.

FAIL

I just need you to answer one truthfully and you seem to have a problem doing so.

DID YOU OR DID YOU NOT HAVE ANYTHING TO SAY IN MAY 2015 WHEN KEVIN IOLE REPORTED THE IVs AND THE RETROACTIVE TUE?

[WesternChamp]

travesty step up biiatch.. go to the other thread and lets do an account ban on our post count. dont be a biiatch now. you wanted to play this game so lets go homey

[koolkc107]

2.0 Criteria for Granting a TUE

Surely you do understand that once the retroactive TUE is applied for, the TUEC applies this code and either grants or denies the application, right?

All of your questions have been answered before numerous times in this thread.

FAIL

I just need you to answer one truthfully and you seem to have a problem doing so.

DID YOU OR DID YOU NOT HAVE ANYTHING TO SAY IN MAY 2015 WHEN KEVIN IOLE REPORTED THE IVs AND THE RETROACTIVE TUE?

[koolkc107]

travesty step up biiatch.. go to the other thread and lets do an account ban on our post count. dont be a biiatch now. you wanted to play this game so lets go homey

Get out of my thread with your petty bullshyt, CisternChimp.

Take that bytchassedness somewhere else.

Go bump one of Loose Siphon's copy-cat threads.

Aren't you sitting on his toilet bowl of a throne in his absence or something?

The management thanks you for your cooperation, idiot.

[WesternChamp]

kool, dont be a biiatch now. snitch supporter!! i like how you tryna get all technical in the other thread to help travesty out LOL..

If you wanted to be completely fair in determining who gets banned, you would only count those posts where either you respond to each other or you talk about one another to someone else.

look at this snitch supporter trying to make rules on how we should go about this account ban bet LOL!!

this snitch supporter is the type to call time out when they get trapped in a corner as a kid playing tag lmao!!!!!!!!!!!