Here's Where All The Floyd Cheat Theories Fail

[travestyny]

and here you talk about the code and post the protocols section of the contract, which fluid ivayweather had an out of anyway, the contract stipulates if the protocols conflict with the contract then the contract will prevail

Then go find where there is a conflict between the two.


Here's a hint.....there is none


How does it feel to get the shlt kicked out of you for this long? Do you know no shame?

[travestyny]

INTERNATIONAL LEVEL,

LMAOOOOOOOO. Do you really want to keep saying this? I mean, I've been trying hard to give you a chance to back out of this statement, but you seem to want to keep going.

If you keep it up, I just may have to own you again. If I do, will you admit that you're wrong, admit that you have no idea what the **** you are talking about, and give the **** up like I've told you to do over and over.

I'm warning you. You're going to get owned again. Just settle down little pup. It's over for you

[koolkc107]

so now its pacquaios fault, IVayweather wanted the testing, his contract to buy usada

No.

Hell no.

Answer the questions.

WHY HASN'T WADA COME AFTER USADA AND SUSPENDED THEM THE SAME WAY THEY DID RUSADA FOR DOING EXACTLY THE SAME THINGS WITH RUSSIAN ATHLETES YOU CLAIM USADA DID WITH FLOYD?

WHAT TOOK HAUSER 4 MONTHS TO ACCUSE FLOYD?

WE KNOW PAC LIKES TO SUE SO WHY DIDN'T HE HERE?

WHAT TOOK ARUM AND PAC 4 MONTHS TO COMMENT?

WHY DIDN'T THEY ASK NSAC TO THROW OUT FIGHT RESULTS?

If you are so sure Floyd cheated, these questions should not be very hard to answer.

So, let's hear what bullshyt you come up with for this.

[Shape up]

1 contract 2 who cares, of no significance 3 contract 4 confidentiality contract 5 contract

[Shape up]

the code 23.2.2the following articles as applicable to the scope of the anti doping activity which the anti doping organization performs must be implemented by signatorieswithout substantive change

what do you think of this

[travestyny]

what do you think of this

Whom are you talking to? Are you just throwing that out to everyone here?

There should not be any substantive change. Ok...so? Is this to show that you found out what substantive means?


There were no substantive changes. If you find one, let us know.

[koolkc107]

1 contract 2 who cares, of no significance 3 contract 4 confidentiality contract 5 contract

What contract did WADA sign?

What kind of confidentiality agreement says you can't talk in May but you can talk in September?

Not good enough.

Explain the answers.

Show your work.

What are you afraid of?

Here are the questions you can't answer again.

WHY HASN'T WADA COME AFTER USADA AND SUSPENDED THEM THE SAME WAY THEY DID RUSADA FOR DOING EXACTLY THE SAME THINGS WITH RUSSIAN ATHLETES YOU CLAIM USADA DID WITH FLOYD?

WHAT TOOK HAUSER 4 MONTHS TO ACCUSE FLOYD?

WE KNOW PAC LIKES TO SUE SO WHY DIDN'T HE HERE?

WHAT TOOK ARUM AND PAC 4 MONTHS TO COMMENT?

WHY DIDN'T THEY ASK NSAC TO THROW OUT FIGHT RESULTS?

[Shape up]

Whom are you talking to? Are you just throwing that out to everyone here?

There should not be any substantive change. Ok...so? Is this to show that you found out what substantive means?


There were no substantive changes. If you find one, let us know.

23.2 Implementation of the Code
23.2.1 The Signatories shall implement applicable Code provisions through policies, statutes, rules or regulations according to their authority and within their relevant spheres of responsibility.
23.2.2 The following Articles as applicable to the scope of the anti-doping activity which the anti-doping organization performs must be implemented by Signatories without substantive change (allowing for any non-substantive changes to the language in order to refer to the organization’s name, sport, section numbers, etc.):
• Article 1 (De nition of Doping)
• Article 2 (Anti-Doping Rule Violations)
• Article 3 (Proof of Doping)
• Article 4.2.2 (Speci ed Substances)
• Article 4.3.3 (Wada’s Determination of the Prohibited list)
• Article 7.11 (Retirement from Sport)
• Article 9 (Automatic disquali cation of individual Results)
• Article 10 (Sanctions on Individuals)
• Article 11 (Consequences to Teams)
• Article 13 (Appeals) with the exception of 13.2.2, 13.6, and 13.7
• Article 15.1 (Recognition of Decisions)
• Article 17 (Statute of Limitations)
• Article 24 (Interpretation of the Code)
• Appendix 1 - Definitions----------------------- So how did they have substantive change to all of these articles above article 10, when clearly it's stated by the code that usada cannot Change it under the rules

[Shape up]

wouldnt implementation of the code be considered important in boxing tooli, seeing they "left it out"

[koolkc107]

There is absolutely nothing I can do to improve upon the thorough asskicking that travestny has given you over and over again on this point so I will let what he has said stand in as rebuttal.

Here are the questions you still can't answer.

WHY HASN'T WADA COME AFTER USADA AND SUSPENDED THEM THE SAME WAY THEY DID RUSADA FOR DOING EXACTLY THE SAME THINGS WITH RUSSIAN ATHLETES YOU CLAIM USADA DID WITH FLOYD?

WHAT TOOK HAUSER 4 MONTHS TO ACCUSE FLOYD?

WE KNOW PAC LIKES TO SUE SO WHY DIDN'T HE HERE?

WHAT TOOK ARUM AND PAC 4 MONTHS TO COMMENT?

WHY DIDN'T THEY ASK NSAC TO THROW OUT FIGHT RESULTS?

This is what I started the thread with.

Read the OP if you have forgotten.

And almost 800 posts later, none of you butthurts have answered it yet with anything better than deflection and cretinism.

Try to do better.