Here's Where All The Floyd Cheat Theories Fail

[ADP02]

Did you even know what the challenge would be?


* Travestyny must actually understand what he agreed on.


See quote above: When you read the document you actually thought that the meds were infused < 50ml


Who is right?
Travestyny: The infusion was < 50ml

ADP02: Understood that the infusion was NOT < 50ml



.

Dude. I accepted the challenge! You claim I was saying he was acting according to the rules and didn’t need a TUE, right?

I’m claiming that your ****** ass has low comprehension skills and I’m saying he gave small injections that USADA believes were consistent with infusions that exceeded the limit, though his purpose for the small injections was to avoid the TUE process.

Am I missing something? Perma ban bet on this right? You ready?

Stop adding words.

It's about what you thought the document said when you read it.

You thought that the injections were indeed < 50ml.

I believe that you were wrong.




.

[ADP02]

I do not have the link but I will search for this while you contemplate on how to respond (damage control) to my previous post....



.

Here is the link:
On the partial sample, the DCO does not have to do a SP test. I believe that this is what you were looking for.

https://www.wada-ama.org/sites/defau...v3_full_en.pdf

[travestyny]

Stop adding words.

It's about what you thought the document said when you read it.

You thought that the injections were indeed < 50ml.

I believe that you were wrong.




.

Adding words? You have low comprehension skills, son.

Once again, what do you think, “he gave infusions via small injections under 50ml” means? Lmaooo.

Do you think I’m saying the small injections added up to 50ml or less? LMAOOOOOOOO.

Dude, there are quotes in the document that even YOU gave that say exactly this!

So...perma-ban bet, or do you admit that you have low comprehension skills. Lmaoooo.

I gave the document to you, clown? You think I didn’t read it?

[travestyny]

Here is the link:
On the partial sample, the DCO does not have to do a SP test. I believe that this is what you were looking for.

https://www.wada-ama.org/sites/defau...v3_full_en.pdf

Got it! Thank you for this!

So now the question that has been waiting for you since a long ass time:

If Mayweather gave a partial sample before and after the IV, why the **** would there be only a partial sample SEALED in the A bottle?

I’ll wait....


By the way, were you going to leave out that this is for a contaminated sample, and the rules state another sample must be given? Lmaoooooo. Dosumpthin was right about you!!! You did it again! I knew you were hiding something!!!

[ADP02]

Got it! Thank you for this!

So now the question that has been waiting for you since a long ass time:

If Mayweather gave a partial sample before and after the IV, why the **** would there be only a partial sample SEALED in the A bottle?

I’ll wait....

Why is that so hard to understand?

[ADP02]

Adding words? You have low comprehension skills, son.

Once again, what do you think, “he gave infusions via small injections under 50ml” means? Lmaooo.

Do you think I’m saying the small injections added up to 50ml or less? LMAOOOOOOOO.

Dude, there are quotes in the document that even YOU gave that say exactly this!

So...perma-ban bet, or do you admit that you have low comprehension skills. Lmaoooo.

I gave the document to you, clown? You think I didn’t read it?

It means that you didn't understand what was going on.



USADA:
Initial protocol was > 50ml
Updated protocol was > 50ml

Travestyny thought that they were < 50ml



Like usual, I prefer a friendly bet ...
why would a Pac fan want to see the one they call DEFLECTO gone?




.

[travestyny]

Why is that so hard to understand?

Dude, you’re a piece of shlt. This is for a contaminated or non-conforming sample, and it says another sample must be given. See how much bullshlt you pull out of your ass.

Your desperation is laughable. Get the **** out of here with that bullshlt!!!

Even a contaminated sample will go to the lab for testing, and yes, they will check the specific gravity in the lab. You are a clown!!!

Now Floyd pissed in front of the DCO, then contaminated the sample, and the DCO fills out a form that is sent to the lab and WADA that says the urine was contaminated by Floyd? Unbelievable...in so many ways

[travestyny]

It means that you didn't understand what was going on.



USADA:
Initial protocol was > 50ml
Updated protocol was > 50ml

Travestyny thought that they were < 50ml



Like usual, I prefer a friendly bet ...
why would a Pac fan want to see the one they call DEFLECTO gone?




.

Oh, I didn’t understand what was going on? Lmaooo.

Last I checked, I accepted YOUR challenge. You have yet to accept...

YOUR CHALLENGE

Or...

MY CHALLENGE, WHICH WAS ON THE TOPIC THAT YOU DONT WANA DISCUSS ANYMORE. YOU KNOW. THAT SALAZAR MANIPULATED INFO TO GET TUES.

I ACCEPTED BOTH. WHAT ABOUT YOU?

[ADP02]

Got it! Thank you for this!

So now the question that has been waiting for you since a long ass time:

If Mayweather gave a partial sample before and after the IV, why the **** would there be only a partial sample SEALED in the A bottle?

I’ll wait....


By the way, were you going to leave out that this is for a contaminated sample, and the rules state another sample must be given? Lmaoooooo. Dosumpthin was right about you!!! You did it again! I knew you were hiding something!!!

Read below. All partial samples are to be done that way!!!!

You got another one WRONG!!!!

NOTE: When pouring urine into the A and B bottles the DCO will instruct the Athlete to
leave a residual amount (<2ml) in the collection vessel.
The DCO should not perform
specific gravity testing on a partial sample.

In this case, the measurements should only
be done after the combined amount of urine meets the minimum volume requirements
and has been sealed in the A and B bottles.

[travestyny]

Like usual, I prefer a friendly bet ...
why would a Pac fan want to see the one they call DEFLECTO gone?
.

LMAOOOOOOOO. YOU’RE BlTCHING OUTTTTTT!!!!