Why do the same posters who claim VADA is the best side with Wilders dirty foes?

[Shape up]

WADA confirmed that under the 2015 World Anti-Doping Code and the International Standard for The****utic Use Exemptions (ISTUE), a retroactive TUE can be granted for an IV drip to combat dehydration. “For a case that would be monitored by WADA, yes the ISTUE could allow for intravenous infusions to be used in instances of dehydration”,

[travestyny]

WADA confirmed that under the 2015 World Anti-Doping Code and the International Standard for The****utic Use Exemptions (ISTUE), a retroactive TUE can be granted for an IV drip to combat dehydration. “For a case that would be monitored by WADA, yes the ISTUE could allow for intravenous infusions to be used in instances of dehydration”,

Why are you still posting this? Doesn't that prove that, ACCORDING TO WADA RULES, IT COULD BE DONE.


Do you understand that? They told you that this can be done according to their rules. Now you're saying that USADA can do what they want? Ok. Then still...WHAT THE **** IS THE PROBLEM IF USADA CAN DO WHAT THEY WANT, AND THEY CHOSE TO FOLLOW WADA'S RULES???

Give it up.

[Shape up]

Why are you still posting this? Doesn't that prove that, ACCORDING TO WADA RULES, IT COULD BE DONE.


Do you understand that? They told you that this can be done according to their rules. Now you're saying that USADA can do what they want? Ok. Then still...WHAT THE **** IS THE PROBLEM IF USADA CAN DO WHAT THEY WANT, AND THEY CHOSE TO FOLLOW WADA'S RULES???

Give it up.

It needs to be monitored by WADA, was it monitored ,NO, was it given in an appropriate medical setting, NO, was there an alternative treatment available, YES, for mild dehydration he needed a prior TUE, did he have that, NO. ------------------ but bu bu bu but the istue

[travestyny]

It needs to be monitored by WADA, was it monitored ,NO, was it given in an appropriate medical setting, NO, was there an alternative treatment available, YES, for mild dehydration he needed a prior TUE, did he have that, NO. ------------------ but bu bu bu but the istue

You're a moron. The WADA spokesman is commenting on what USADA did, you idiot.

If USADA did something wrong, who punishes USADA?


WADA!!!


You ****ing dopehead.

You need to stop crying about this shlt. Stick to the facts that you can't figure out how the **** he would dilute his urine with an IV when the urine was checked for dilution by the doping control officer AND by the WADA lab. Right there should tell you to give the **** up. I'm sorry he beat your god and you can't get over it. If you got a problem, go take it up with WADA. They'll probably tell you THE SAME THING THEY WERE QUOTED AS SAYING ABOUT THIS INCIDENT.

It's very simple:

Who checks up on USADA?: WADA
Does WADA know what USADA did in this case: YES!
Did WADA do anything to USADA: No!

Then shut the **** up!

[Shape up]

WADA confirmed that under the 2015 World Anti-Doping Code and the International Standard for The****utic Use Exemptions (ISTUE), a retroactive TUE CAN be granted for an IV drip to combat dehydration. “For a case that WOULD BE monitored by WADA, yes the ISTUE could allow for intravenous infusions to be used in instances of dehydration”, a WADA spokesperson told the Sports Integrity Initiative. HOWEVER, the spokesperson added: “This case is NOT ONE THAT IS MONITORED by WADA because the World Boxing Council is not a signatory to the Code. We understand that USADA was contracted to conduct the anti-doping program for this fight

[Shape up]

Some reports suggest that administration of IV infusions, including dietary supplement and vitamin ****tails, are being provided to athletes for recuperation, recovery or lifestyle reasons. This medical practice is PROHIBITED AT ALL TIMESwithout PRIOR TUE approval.----------–--- all times, doesn't say but but but the istue

[travestyny]

Some reports suggest that administration of IV infusions, including dietary supplement and vitamin ****tails, are being provided to athletes for recuperation, recovery or lifestyle reasons. This medical practice is PROHIBITED AT ALL TIMESwithout PRIOR TUE approval.----------–--- all times, doesn't say but but but the istue

WADA confirmed that under the 2015 World Anti-Doping Code and the International Standard for The****utic Use Exemptions (ISTUE), a retroactive TUE CAN be granted for an IV drip to combat dehydration.

Thanks, WADA

[Shape up]

WADA confirmed that under the 2015 World Anti-Doping Code and the International Standard for The****utic Use Exemptions (ISTUE), a retroactive TUE CAN be granted for an IV drip to combat dehydration.

Thanks, WADA

[COLOR="Red"][SIZE="7"]if it is monitored by WADA, this wasn't monitored by wada[COLOR="rgb(153, 50, 204)"]FAIL

[travestyny]

[COLOR="Red"][SIZE="7"]if it is monitored by WADA, this wasn't monitored by wada[COLOR="rgb(153, 50, 204)"]FAIL

Looks like you failed trying to resize that text


You're a moron. If WADA says it's ok by their rules IF they are monitoring it......

that means USADA was within WADA's rules, you dummy!


Now go play in traffic, kid! You lose, as usual.

[Shape up]

WADA has to monitor it, not usada, your very dense