Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Juan Manuel Marquez Gave Golovkin The Edge Over Canelo

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    Originally posted by JK1700 View Post
    I can see the argument either way. Of course if you watched it with Jim "**** **** JAB JAB JAB" Lampley cheerleading you would obviously think GGG got robbed. I watched it in silence and thought it could've gone either way. As long as there's a rematch and we get a "for sure" winner either way i'll be happy.
    Nah. I'm not trying to push an agenda. You are.

    Golovkin won that fight and we all saw it.

    Stop it. Let Canelo prove it. He needs a second chance though. He didn't win and he knows it in his heart.

    Mexicans are very proud people. When he felt those boo's he knew it. He didn't win.


    Prove me wrong.

    Comment


    • #62
      Misleading title. Travieso said that GGG won by 2 points but that he was fine with the drdaw, it could have gone either way. Marquez said GGG won but we know he is a Canelo hater and Erc Morales said Canelo won and proved his critics wrong. Julio Cesar Chavez, the most important Mexican Boxer said Canelo won, so what´s the big deal??

      Comment


      • #63
        Originally posted by Beercules View Post
        Nah. I'm not trying to push an agenda. You are.

        Golovkin won that fight and we all saw it.

        Stop it. Let Canelo prove it. He needs a second chance though. He didn't win and he knows it in his heart.

        Mexicans are very proud people. When he felt those boo's he knew it. He didn't win.


        Prove me wrong.
        GGG lost, there. I proved you wrong.

        Comment


        • #64
          Originally posted by Beercules View Post
          Nah. I'm not trying to push an agenda. You are.

          Golovkin won that fight and we all saw it.

          Stop it. Let Canelo prove it. He needs a second chance though. He didn't win and he knows it in his heart.

          Mexicans are very proud people. When he felt those boo's he knew it. He didn't win.


          Prove me wrong.
          LOL I never said you were pushing an agenda calm down . All i'm saying is I had Canelo winning, but I could see it going either way I thought it was very close and debatable. That's just my opinion, just like you have yours. I'm not gonna go back and forth with people over this because everyone scores differently. I just think it's kinda funny how some people think it was a one-sided fight. I have no problem with people saying either guy won I just think it's ridiculous for them to be acting like this was some sort of beatdown/robbery. When it's difficult to find more than 5 rounds that either guy clearly won, there were several close ones. At least 3-4.

          The rematch will settle the debate. It can't come soon enough.
          Last edited by JK1700; 10-02-2017, 10:20 PM.

          Comment


          • #65
            Originally posted by JK1700 View Post
            LOL I never said you were pushing an agenda calm down . I'm saying I had Canelo winning, but I could see it going either way I thought it was very close and debatable. That's just my opinion, just like you have yours. I'm not gonna go back and forth with people over this because everyone scores differently. I just think it's kinda funny how some people think it was a one-sided fight. I have no problem with people saying either guy won I just think it's ridiculous for them to be acting like this was some sort of beatdown/robbery. When it's difficult to find more than 5 rounds that either guy won, there were several close ones. At least 3-4.

            The rematch will settle the debate.
            Canelo didn't beat Golovkin. Show me.

            Comment


            • #66
              Originally posted by budfr View Post
              GGG lost, there. I proved you wroxng.
              He didn't though.

              Comment


              • #67
                Originally posted by Beercules View Post
                Canelo didn't beat Golovkin. Show me.
                I can't find my scorecard, maybe i'll watch it again this week.

                I'm really not here to argue, just saying I can see both sides of the argument. I could see people being swayed by the commentary, which is why I watched it without that. If you favor aggression you'll probably have Golovkin winning, if you favor clean punching you'll probably have Canelo winning. In any case I didn't think it was a robbery but I do think a rematch is needed to end all this talk about it.

                Comment


                • #68
                  Originally posted by JK1700 View Post
                  I can't find my scorecard, maybe i'll watch it again this week.

                  I'm really not here to argue, just saying I can see both sides of the argument. I could see people being swayed by the commentary, which is why I watched it without that. If you favor aggression you'll probably have Golovkin winning, if you favor clean punching you'll probably have Canelo winning. In any case I didn't think it was a robbery but I do think a rematch is needed to end all this talk about it.
                  That's fine. G won a close fight over a prime Canelo.

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  X
                  TOP