Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Why couldn't Canelo Alvarez beat Golovkin as convincingly as Pacquiao beat Margarito?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Why couldn't Canelo Alvarez beat Golovkin as convincingly as Pacquiao beat Margarito?

    Considering I've been reading and hearing comments lately about how Golovkin is only as good (or rather as bad) as Antonio Margarito. As in, Golovkin's boxing level is at Margarito's level whilst many of those favoring Canelo Alvarez to beat Golovkin have been commenting on how much superior Canelo's boxing skill / level is, compared to Golovkin and the margin between the two overall in the skill / level department. As if Canelo Alvarez is a character from a play-station game with matrix like abilities whilst Golovkin is a Antonio Margarito clone. That's how the margin between the two have been described frequently between Golovkin and Canelo Alvarez in terms of boxing skill / level.

    So why couldn't Canelo Alvarez demolish GGG as convincingly or more convincingly compared to how the legendary Manny Pacquiao demolished Antonio Margarito?

  • #2
    Why did Abel Sanchez say Angulo was the best sparring they hassssa everz had?

    Comment


    • #3
      Prime Pac was a different beast with his offensive skills, he was an offensive powerhouse who throw crazy combos with great speed. Manny beat some of those fighters like nobody else. He destroyed Margarito, De la Hoya and Cotto. Knocked Hatton brutally out cold in just two rounds. Knocked Marquez down multiple times. Only man to ever finish Barrera.

      Also GGG is a harder opponent than Margarito imo. Dont know why people would say that Margarito is on GGG's level or even more

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by Ganstaz003 View Post
        Considering I've been reading and hearing comments lately about how Golovkin is only as good (or rather as bad) as Antonio Margarito. As in, Golovkin's boxing level is at Margarito's level whilst many of those favoring Canelo Alvarez to beat Golovkin have been commenting on how much superior Canelo's boxing skill / level is, compared to Golovkin and the margin between the two overall in the skill / level department. As if Canelo Alvarez is a character from a play-station game with matrix like abilities whilst Golovkin is a Antonio Margarito clone. That's how the margin between the two have been described frequently between Golovkin and Canelo Alvarez in terms of boxing skill / level.

        So why couldn't Canelo Alvarez demolish GGG as convincingly or more convincingly compared to how the legendary Manny Pacquiao demolished Antonio Margarito?
        Why couldn't Manny beat Margarito like Shane did? What does it matter?

        Comment


        • #5
          Canelo isn't on PEDs like the 2010 version of Pacquiao

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by Floyd's Mask View Post
            Why did Abel Sanchez say Angulo was the best sparring they hassssa everz had?
            You haven't answered my question. Why couldn't Canelo Alvarez, who was meant to be that MUCH more skilled than Golovkin (who is seemingly only a Margarito clone by many) totally demolish Golovkin and end his career in their last match, like how Manny Pacquiao did to Antonio Margarito?

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Ganstaz003 View Post
              You haven't answered my question. Why couldn't Canelo Alvarez, who was meant to be that MUCH more skilled than Golovkin (who is seemingly only a Margarito clone by many) totally demolish Golovkin and end his career in their last match, like how Manny Pacquiao did to Antonio Margarito?
              Should I bump the NSB pickem polls for this fight? Would u like to read those comments and see the polls figures?

              GGG cheerleaders trying to convince reverse psychology when their predictions were exposed...

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Death_Adder View Post
                Canelo isn't on PEDs like the 2010 version of Pacquiao
                Andddddd /thread.

                Ca$hnelo won 8-4 on my card and I never had any doubts heading to the cards.

                But of course Abel and Gennady have a fix in like they did for Jacobs. Such cheats is lmfao...anyone from 147-175 doe. Need CW doe. Wont move down 1 pound doe

                XD XD XD

                Besides if coming forward and missing punches is effective aggression than didn't Margarito beat Pacquiao? ???? Gggaholic #logic
                Last edited by Bjl12; 09-28-2017, 12:36 PM.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by BoxingTrav View Post
                  Why couldn't Manny beat Margarito like Shane did? What does it matter?
                  Manny Pacquiao practically ended Margarito's career. Apart from the stoppage, Pacman beat Margarito pretty much as convincingly as Shane Mosley did. Especially when taking into consideration Pacman had no business even competing at that weight against opponents of that size whilst Mosley is a much bigger sized boxer than Pacquiao. So what Pacman did to Margarito (taking size into consideration) > what Shane Mosley did to Margarito.

                  Why does it matter you ask? Because if Canelo Alvarez was as skilled as many that favored him claimed him to be and if Golovkin was a Margarito clone as many claimed, then that's how big the margin of victory should've been for Canelo over Golovkin. However, it wasn't. Why was that?

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Death_Adder View Post
                    Canelo isn't on PEDs like the 2010 version of Pacquiao
                    Can you actually provide proof / evidence for these claims or did you just pull that out of your ass?

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X
                    TOP