Why TF Nayay Inouauya is in top 10 P4P, but Usyk isn't?

[g27region]

I don't follow small weights, but hardcore fans should explain....Any of these 14 guys in his resume better than Glowacki or even Huck? I see a bunch of guys with 6,7,9 or 10 losses there, no undefeated opponents at all

[betmen]

nayay inouauya

sound like pacific islander

[DuckAdonis]

Inoue is not in my top 10 and usyk will be

[jas]

Inoue is less beatable than usyk

Inoue punches way harder p4p and he never loses rounds whereas usyk has.

Some say inoues combos are repetitive and predictable but i think hes an absolute beast

Usyk lost a couple rounds to mchunu and hunter. His reactions to punches being thrown at him relative to his weight class arent as good as inoues imho. And he doesnt let his hands go enough imo. Too safety first.

[black.ink]

If you don't follow Inoue or anybody around his weightclass, you are missing out on a whole lot of the sport. Some of the years greatest fights have come below 122.

[boliodogs]

If you don't like whatever pfp list you are complaining about just write up your own list. You can do that you know. Your list is just as good as their list. No worse or no better. It's all just opinion and not undeniable fact. Inouauya can't fight Usyk so we will never know for sure who is better for their pounds.

[Citizen Koba]

If you don't like whatever pfp list you are complaining about just write up your own list. You can do that you know. Your list is just as good as their list. No worse or no better. It's all just opinion and not undeniable fact. Inouauya can't fight Usyk so we will never know for sure who is better for their pounds.

This ^. I genuinely can't understand why folk get hung up on this BS as if P4P is any more than some speculative made up BS. OK - in general most of us who follow boxing close enough to be posting on here have a fair idea about who the the top ten or 15 best fighters in the world are, but trying to rank them in some precise order with no direct means of comparison is a fools errand - hell, even ranking fighters within a single division with common opponents ain't a precise science - what fucking chance is their of comparing a LHW with a flyweight for instance?

It's a bit of fun and like you say, if you don't like someone else's list then just make your own... no one can ever prove that yours ain't the best list in the world.

[soul_survivor]

I don't follow small weights, but hardcore fans should explain....Any of these 14 guys in his resume better than Glowacki or even Huck? I see a bunch of guys with 6,7,9 or 10 losses there, no undefeated opponents at all

I think it is based more on how good Inoue would be if weight was irrelevant, i.e. he looks to be more difficult to beat. Usyk had some close rounds against an almost shot Huck last time out.

Having said that, I have Usyk creeping into my list, mainly because a position opened up as RG dropped out.

[NEETzsche]

Usyk has the better resume and more talent imo. I'll put my neck on the line and say Sor Rungvisai does Inoue like he did Roman

[Madison Boxing]

usyks in my top 10 and inoue would be lucky to get in my top 30 let alone my top 10. not heard of a single fighter hes beat. shouldnt he have to beat gonzalaz, cuadras, estrda or wangek before people start riding his ****? or is beating a legitimate opponent not important these days...