And the NEW P4P NUMBER 1 FIGHTER BY RING MAGAZINE

[Madison Boxing]

I have him ranked -5748283737274

a few places higher than robbie barrett has him rated

[Madison Boxing]

yep, undoubtedly the number 1 fighter on the planet after doing a number on jacobs and canelo this year. Nice to see an entertaining, fan friendly fighter on the top of the list too, goes to show you can be effective AND entertaining at the same time.

[Visceral]

"An unknown fighter, who no one knew..."

[Shape up]

I have no problem with your opinion. Just saying GBP Magazine is not the source to hang your hat on. I would go with ESPN or Boxing News instead.

EsSPN has ggg as #1P4P aswell, there goes your argument

[Motorcity Cobra]

Usyk not on this list. This list is a joke. Kovalev coming off two losses still on the list. In reality looking at Kovalev's resume it's now worse than GGG's. Rigo, Spence, and Visa Card shouldn't be on this list.

[hugh grant]

Nelo must have come to terms with fact nobody thought he beat GGG now.
There are probably some people who genuinely think he beat GGG on this earth but its unlikely nelo has met them befoire

[MDPopescu]

Which has to mean that Ring Magazine considers GGG the winner vs Canelo or otherwise Canelo's rating wouldn't be No. 6. Funny thing is Oscar is a part owner of Ring Magazine.

... which means that The Ring is going for the rematch...

ESPN has ggg as #1P4P as well, ...

... which we already know...

[Pigeons]

So Ring has GGG #1 and TC #2 and TBRB has 'em the other way round - either way they both have 'em top 2. Given that p4p is about as far from an exact science as you can get don't you think accusations of bias are a bit unwarranted based on this minor difference in opinion?

See what I mean about it being a bit silly to take this **** seriously?

There's broad agreement on who the ten or so best fighters in the world are, with minor differences - anyone who genuinely thinks they can tell with exactitude the precise order those guys should come in, is of course entitled to their opinion - myself I think the whole fuckin thing's a pile of subjective garbage.

There's a reason the IBRO derecognized The Ring as the source for lineages and every respectable writer that voted in their rankings left for TBRB.

I have no problem if a legitimate source had Golovkin #1, but The Ring is not a legitimate source. It is owned by Oscar De La Hoya and Golden Boy Promotions. Imagine if Al Haymon owned The Ring.

You can call the P4P list silly but I don't think it's any more silly than becoming a "world champion" by beating Nilson Julio Tapia or Marco Antonio Rubio. Boxing can be looked at as a big joke if you really want to go that far. The Ring was once the gold standard for boxing. That ended when a promoter purchased the magazine.

[Mammoth]

Usyk not on this list. This list is a joke. Kovalev coming off two losses still on the list. In reality looking at Kovalev's resume it's now worse than GGG's. Rigo, Spence, and Visa Card shouldn't be on this list.

Visa Card is a beast

[BoxingFan85]

It's just my opinion bro.

GGG won't last long in this position with fighters like Crawford and Lomachenko around.

Wait! is he fighting Loma & Bud at 160?