Originally posted by techliam
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Joshua vs. Wilder-Ortiz Winner - Guaranteed in 2018, Says Hearn
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by ScottWeiland View PostI usually cut you an exceptionally wide berth as I hold you in exceptionally low regard, but I'll bite I figure I owe the forum that much to expose you further as the absolute moronic fückwitted imbecile you are.
Hearn states Parker's stock has dropped considerably so as to build the potential ppv U.K. showdown with Parker AJ, he never at any point brings up Whyte facing Parker, it's clear what he's up to, he's readying to lowball Parker an offer he knows won't be accepted as Hearn holds ALL the cards.
And why wouldn't Parker exploit the Japanese market which is relatively the same time zone as Oceania where Parker already does ppv often an hour or two before midday ?
If Hearn really wanted AJ Parker after Pulev you'd expect he'd be hasty to arrange Whyte vs Parker for a potential AJ match up in the spring. If you would like we could have a gentlemans bet on who AJ's next opponent is after Pulev, assuming of course he gets past Pulev which most certainly is not a given taking into account his defensive shortcomings against genuinely talented opposition.
But in terms of Parker exploiting the 'Japanese market' - there isn't one for him to exploit
There are so few Asian Heavy's that he really is better off doing what he's doing
Leave a comment:
-
[QUOTE=Butch.McRae;18094040]He lands anything before AJ gets to him and he could win. Vladimir had a solid jab/right hand that he caught Joshua with quite a bit. It took Joshua like 7 or 8 rounds to stop getting caught with that.
That's what Wilder does best. And he faster than Vladimir. He could catch him.
His movement could be a potential gassing issue for AJ too. You never know. Look how tyson beat Klitschko. It was hard to believe. You never know in
Tyson and Wilder were in two different classes
Leave a comment:
-
Sooner rather than later. Unify the belts. Enough of the lesser sanctioning bodies playing bull**** politics.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by ScottWeiland View PostPoor Joey Parker, he can't catch a break right now, Hearn calling him out on his stock plummeting after Hughie ran from him all night, give the man some credit ffs, name me one person who has looked good against a Peter Fury trained boxer, id say fighter but his stable of juicers spend anything but fighting their way through 12 rounds of in-action.
I guess this means Hearn is taking Bellew and Whyte off the table for Joey, so to scupper his chances of a unification further against his cash cow AJ. Damn bastard.
Though in all honesty it wouldn't matter how much stock Parker has... that fight would be to unify the heavyweight title and would be huge on that fact alone.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by NahMean View PostBreazeale is trash.. He has heart but I don’t see him winning. But then again Stiverne is trash too.. Battle of the Bums.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by ScottWeiland View PostYou're proposing Whyte beats Parker, ok I see what you're doing here, you believe Whyte was a solid win for AJ, that's what you want to run with here right ? You're aware Banks didn't want Whyte to face AJ so soon and wanted more fights together to craft and hone skill, skill which is clearly lacking and as highlighted against Chisora fitness and stamina too. Their seems to be the lowly held notion by posters like yourself Whyte and Chisora was this epic barnstormer, it was a shyt show, two guys who couldn't put two successive heavy punches together to get the other out, one started slow and came on strong later (Whyte) the other started fast and slower later (Chisora) their conditioning was absurdly poor, their skills or lack of skills should we add clearly anything but world level.
Whyte proved that night he is of the same level as Chisora, Chisora hasn't been the same fighter since 2012, or we could say he is the same fighter he was in 2012 he hasn't progressed. He isn't and wasn't any good to begin with. Whyte is no better, no worse, he's simply shyt. If you wanna run with he's a great win for AJ fabulous, run with it but don't expect anyone other than other like minded buffoons to agree with you.
I'm held in higher regard on here than you are, by AJ, Wilder and Fury supporters, neither one of them I really care for, that I'm well aware of. AJ is the best of a shallow talent pool and Parker would most certainly be a solid win on his ledger, a fight I expect AJ would win, some would like to underplay not me, I recognise talent and give credit where it's due, I don't over promote one win for something it isn't to elevate the standing of another, standing is earnt in the ring as I'll duly credit Wilder if he beats Ortiz not that I think he will, same with Fury, he established himself no.1 after beating the no.1, since he's departed through his inability to take account of his own actions I feel Klitschko vs AJ was a fight between the top two in the division establishing AJ a clear and decisive no.1.
I'm not agenda driven like yourself other than I can't understand why Parker is not given credit for convincingly defeating a guy who wanted to be anywhere else but in the ring opposite Joey.
You think Hearn doesn't want Parker facing Whyte as he'll lose and the Parker fight will be off the cards, I can't really add anymore to that if you genuinely believe Whyte is head and shoulders above Parker, he'll be a challenge Whyte I'll give him that but he doesn't win a decision nor stop Parker.
I never said Whyte was head and shoulders above Parker ( thats just more deflection crack head talk you do best ) It beats you stating Whyte is garbage which is unrealistic though isnt it ?
Not many on here would agree with you (bc they are actually boxing fans ) that Whyte vs Chisora was a shyte show as many wouldn't agree that M. Perez is a LAZY FAT AZZ either would they crack head ?
You are more held to a higher regard on here aye ? :wank:
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by juggernaut666 View PostWhy wouldn't Parker EXPLOIT the japanese market ?
Really thats your limitations on how much you actually grasp this sport where also everyone are bums /ped users and in general are overatted in your world .
The bigger question that concerns you why do you even follow this sport ,obviouly you dont know what you're talking about half the time and run on ridiculous deflections on here !
Hearn wouldn't want Parker vs Whyte and i already explained why to you ,proving once again how dense you are and most know that on here that you have difficulties with logical interactions on here which is why you go from decent poster to total ****** ina matter of sentences !
The only one you should cut a break is yourself and actually take a moment and put some thought into your posts before you post them: Taking back Mike Perez is a "LAZY AZZ" would be a start you crack head wouldn't it ?
Whyte proved that night he is of the same level as Chisora, Chisora hasn't been the same fighter since 2012, or we could say he is the same fighter he was in 2012 he hasn't progressed. He isn't and wasn't any good to begin with. Whyte is no better, no worse, he's simply shyt. If you wanna run with he's a great win for AJ fabulous, run with it but don't expect anyone other than other like minded buffoons to agree with you.
I'm held in higher regard on here than you are, by AJ, Wilder and Fury supporters, neither one of them I really care for, that I'm well aware of. AJ is the best of a shallow talent pool and Parker would most certainly be a solid win on his ledger, a fight I expect AJ would win, some would like to underplay not me, I recognise talent and give credit where it's due, I don't over promote one win for something it isn't to elevate the standing of another, standing is earnt in the ring as I'll duly credit Wilder if he beats Ortiz not that I think he will, same with Fury, he established himself no.1 after beating the no.1, since he's departed through his inability to take account of his own actions I feel Klitschko vs AJ was a fight between the top two in the division establishing AJ a clear and decisive no.1.
I'm not agenda driven like yourself other than I can't understand why Parker is not given credit for convincingly defeating a guy who wanted to be anywhere else but in the ring opposite Joey.
You think Hearn doesn't want Parker facing Whyte as he'll lose and the Parker fight will be off the cards, I can't really add anymore to that if you genuinely believe Whyte is head and shoulders above Parker, he'll be a challenge Whyte I'll give him that but he doesn't win a decision nor stop Parker.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by ScottWeiland View PostI usually cut you an exceptionally wide berth as I hold you in exceptionally low regard, but I'll bite I figure I owe the forum that much to expose you further as the absolute moronic fückwitted imbecile you are.
Hearn states Parker's stock has dropped considerably so as to build the potential ppv U.K. showdown with Parker AJ, he never at any point brings up Whyte facing Parker, it's clear what he's up to, he's readying to lowball Parker an offer he knows won't be accepted as Hearn holds ALL the cards.
And why wouldn't Parker exploit the Japanese market which is relatively the same time zone as Oceania where Parker already does ppv often an hour or two before midday ?
If Hearn really wanted AJ Parker after Pulev you'd expect he'd be hasty to arrange Whyte vs Parker for a potential AJ match up in the spring. If you would like we could have a gentlemans bet on who AJ's next opponent is after Pulev, assuming of course he gets past Pulev which most certainly is not a given taking into account his defensive shortcomings against genuinely talented opposition.
Really thats your limitations on how much you actually grasp this sport where also everyone are bums /ped users and in general are overatted in your world .
The bigger question that concerns you why do you even follow this sport ,obviouly you dont know what you're talking about half the time and run on ridiculous deflections on here !
Hearn wouldn't want Parker vs Whyte and i already explained why to you ,proving once again how dense you are and most know that on here that you have difficulties with logical interactions on here which is why you go from decent poster to total ****** ina matter of sentences !
The only one you should cut a break is yourself and actually take a moment and put some thought into your posts before you post them: Taking back Mike Perez is a "LAZY AZZ" would be a start you crack head wouldn't it ?Last edited by juggernaut666; 09-28-2017, 09:36 AM.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by juggernaut666 View PostIf Parker fought Whyte there would be no Joshua fight . Why would Hearn take away TWO championship fights for Joshua that would sell? Why do you think Hearn offered Ortiz a fight with someone else than taking a Wilder fight ? He wants Joshua to fight them all thats why .
Its also not up to Hearn on wjo Parker fights ,thats why Parker is going after Fujimoto or some other non top 10 guy , so Hearn has to push others performances .
Hearn states Parker's stock has dropped considerably so as to build the potential ppv U.K. showdown with Parker AJ, he never at any point brings up Whyte facing Parker, it's clear what he's up to, he's readying to lowball Parker an offer he knows won't be accepted as Hearn holds ALL the cards.
And why wouldn't Parker exploit the Japanese market which is relatively the same time zone as Oceania where Parker already does ppv often an hour or two before midday ?
If Hearn really wanted AJ Parker after Pulev you'd expect he'd be hasty to arrange Whyte vs Parker for a potential AJ match up in the spring. If you would like we could have a gentlemans bet on who AJ's next opponent is after Pulev, assuming of course he gets past Pulev which most certainly is not a given taking into account his defensive shortcomings against genuinely talented opposition.
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: