finally!! Realistic COMPUBOX GGG vs ALVAREZ, BYRD Should Be Given APOLOGY BY INDUSTRY

[TonyGe]

What we do know is Gennady was bombing leaping left hooks jumping off the ground to only lightly push Alvarez's right hand guard covering his right chin. When Alvarez did the same type but not leaping left hook Gennady was being pushed more.

I think Gennady was too timid... Nelo, again, is the only adversary to bend his weight, squat, lean back in close range comfortably. Jacobs cant even do that nor is his style. Nelo was all bad for GGg whcih makes the rematch better.

Honestly both guys made some mistakes. Golovkin made the better adjustments in this fight though. Golovkin neglicting his body attack may have cost him a KO. I fully expect a better fight this time around. Hopefully soon before May.

[Lester Tutor]

Honestly both guys made some mistakes. Golovkin made the better adjustments in this fight though. Golovkin neglicting his body attack may have cost him a KO. I fully expect a better fight this time around. Hopefully soon before May.

Alvarez is a pimp. The guy is a very interesting boxer to read. People say he fights in spurs but that's only BECAUSE he's a great combination puncher and conservative with wreckless offense.

Lets revise the top 10 p4p and combinations

Rigo? No.... spurs?
Loma? Yes... but missed a lot agaisnt Sosa ffs...sloppy
Spence? Nope. Great at followup 1-2's expecially to the body moving forward.
TC? Nope. His offensive attack is rudimentary like Pac..
M. Garcia? Nope. 1-2s
Kovalev? Nope...like a TC..finisher but nothing fancy
GGG? Hell no.

Alvarez is the best combination puncher in the game. But they call him "flat footed" is beyonf ******. Only way Marquez ever did combos was to stay planted.

When Alvarez did a Pac style or Morales type move agaosnt GGG in the 5th where Lil'G has his guard up being pushed back in the ring... thise are rudimentary.

Ill go for clean and effective combos "planted" in Nelo's style.

Black-Nelo is a really good boxer and stood his ground like a boss to a Kazakh Olympian that is ideally a 168 fighter by now anyways.

[Mr. 29K]

Beautiful thread! Green k. Triple Flop got an ass whooping; even the guys I bet against said the same thing. I got paid either way.

Triple L is not on Canelo’s level; he should fight bums like Kovaroid.

[TonyGe]

Alvarez is a pimp. The guy is a very interesting boxer to read. People say he fights in spurs but that's only BECAUSE he's a great combination puncher and conservative with wreckless offense.

Lets revise the top 10 p4p and combinations

Rigo? No.... spurs?
Loma? Yes... but missed a lot agaisnt Sosa ffs...sloppy
Spence? Nope. Great at followup 1-2's expecially to the body moving forward.
TC? Nope. His offensive attack is rudimentary like Pac..
M. Garcia? Nope. 1-2s
Kovalev? Nope...like a TC..finisher but nothing fancy
GGG? Hell no.

Alvarez is the best combination puncher in the game. But they call him "flat footed" is beyonf ******. Only way Marquez ever did combos was to stay planted.

When Alvarez did a Pac style or Morales type move agaosnt GGG in the 5th where Lil'G has his guard up being pushed back in the ring... thise are rudimentary.

Ill go for clean and effective combos "planted" in Nelo's style.

Black-Nelo is a really good boxer and stood his ground like a boss to a Kazakh Olympian that is ideally a 168 fighter by now anyways.

No he moved to get away from Golovkin's power. He wasn't slick. He was afraid. He didn't stand his ground. That's laughable. He's got by thanks to some favorable judging in the past..

[Lester Tutor]

No he moved to get away from Golovkin's power. He wasn't slick. He was afraid. He didn't stand his ground. That's laughable. He's got by thanks to some favorable judging in the past..

He didnt stand his ground? Alvarez landed great compubox while moving and striking? Nelo isnt Khan or Lara...

Its ok. Look at your posting. Until I schooled u on what happened you went from objective observation to giving up and dıscrediting Alvarez. Anybody can read our convo and can see u folded your cards to cry about the cliche narrative that he ran without detailing specific rounds

[aboutfkntime]

I hate (enjoy) contradicting you but Pacquiao beat Mayweather.

I can understand you making that comment while you are riding home on the short bus, with the other clowns..... but, making that comment when talking with REAL boxing fans?

hahah be that guy, if you wish

..... then again, you are on the other thread insisting that Canelo was a middleweight when he fought at 155..... so, I guess you are that guy lol

[aboutfkntime]

No he moved to get away from Golovkin's power. He wasn't slick. He was afraid. He didn't stand his ground. That's laughable. He's got by thanks to some favorable judging in the past..

you absolute muppet

that is the very textbook definition of boxing

good god

no wonder you think that Pac beat Mayweather lol..... as Manny got led around like a dog on a leash, looking lost, with no gameplan..... no speed/angles/death-by-a-thousand-beestings..... nothing

trust you to think that the winner is the guy who got out-boxed and fired blanks all night..... now I see why you think Golovkin won lol

you are showing your true colors today Tony..... you are very firmly in the pac-tard/golov-tard/casual-fan, camp

[TonyGe]

you absolute muppet

that is the very textbook definition of boxing

good god

no wonder you think that Pac beat Mayweather lol..... as Manny got led around like a dog on a leash, looking lost, with no gameplan..... no speed/angles/death-by-a-thousand-beestings..... nothing

trust you to think that the winner is the guy who got out-boxed and fired blanks all night..... now I see why you think Golovkin won lol

you are showing your true colors today Tony..... you are very firmly in the pac-tard/golov-tard/casual-fan, camp

I've been a boxing fan for over 50 years. The reason Mayweather lost is he didn't land the punches that were credited to him by the judges. That's the bottom line. I know I'm in the minority but that's OK. Canelo lost because he was an idiot. His boxing plan was deeply flawed. Yes moving away from punches us a basic part of boxing if you use it to set up your attack. He didn't.. He couldn't even neutralize Golovkin's jab for crying out loud.

[aboutfkntime]

I've been a boxing fan for over 50 years. The reason Mayweather lost is he didn't land the punches that were credited to him by the judges. That's the bottom line. I know I'm in the minority but that's OK. Canelo lost because he was an idiot. His boxing plan was deeply flawed. Yes moving away from punches us a basic part of boxing if you use it to set up your attack. He didn't.. He couldn't even neutralize Golovkin's jab for crying out loud.

are you sure ?

because..... you are running around on the other thread calling Canelo a middleweight when he fought at 155..... AND you thought that Pacquiao beat Mayweather

I explained why that was nonsense, but you did not seem to understand

put it this way..... in your "50" years following boxing, how many middleweights have you seen that weighed 155?

how many middleweights have you seen that weighed 155..... and have never fought a middleweight opponent?

I think that you have most likely been following boxing since the Pac/Hoya fight

Golovkin's game is all about cutting off the ring, and breaking down his opponents..... well, that simply did not happen..... no cutting, no breaking, none of that vaunted bodywork..... ZIP, NADA, ZILCH

Canelo's game is all about outboxing his opponent and catching them with great looking judge-friendly counters/combinations..... and I saw that

we can agree to disagree

[Elroy The Great]

118-110 for anyone in that fight was ludacrisp

fnck byrd, that near sighted hoe