Manny Pacquiao vs.........

[flipside]

of this era sure, but pac never dominated erik morales, and he didnt dominate JMM either, there must be some fantastic drugs of there in the islands or wherever u are out cause u tripping,

you boi has talent anyone who denies it is a moron, he is still young and in his prime and he has 2 great great wins, why dont u wait till his career is over before he call him the GOAT, in all sports there is no such thing as a sure-fire win/person or whatever

just cause sturm aint done **** dont mean you have to hate

you just jealous LOL!

[AintGottaClue]

and Sturm is a lozr for getting scared of Jermain Taylor. HAHAHAHA.

I already Pac whompes Morales, Barrera and Marquez. They're too eazy. Just watch Pac vs Larios on PPV to see the master at work again.

barrera was easy for pac yes, but where do u see morales and JMM being easy for pac?

and what does " I already Pac whompes" mean?


and why are u guys bringing sturm into a manny pacquiao thread?

[Manny_P]

barrera was easy for pac yes, but where do u see morales and JMM being easy for pac?

and what does " I already Pac whompes" mean?


and why are u guys bringing sturm into a manny pacquiao thread?

the moment Morales couldn't dent Manny and won 3 rounds in the 2nd fight. Pac KOed him. He never had a chance anyways. The moment he got it good in the 6th I knew he was dead meat.

[GunStar]

how would manny pacquiao do against the top 10 superbantam weight, featherweight,superfeather,and lightweights of all time,

He will do great against superbantam, superfeather & featherweight. He has never fought in the LW yet, so I can't answer that one yet.

[hellfire508]

best fioghters of this Era. And Pac TKO all them easily. It was easy for Pac. Morales couldn't even dent Pac in the 2nd fight. LOL!!! It was like Morales was punching bricks that night,. NO EFFECT. LMAO!

Well Oscar De La Hoya and Julio Cesar Chavez can be called part of this era.

And what you need to understand is: Everyone gives Pac loads of credit for what he has done. He has gained my full respect, and has become one of my favourit fighters with his style. However, he did lose to Morales in the first fight, and drew (possibly lost) to Marquez. You are not being objective at all.

And BTW, I've seen people on this board call Barrera, Morales and Marquez ******* and bums time, and time, and time again. If they are *******, then EVERY fighter that ever lived is a *****. Especially Morales, he is the definition of a warrior in boxing.

So my advice to those Pac fans calling the Mexican fighters "bums and *******" = All you are doing is talking your boy down. Obviously by your logic, Pac has beaten NOBODY except bums.

[hellfire508]

the moment Morales couldn't dent Manny and won 3 rounds in the 2nd fight. Pac KOed him. He never had a chance anyways. The moment he got it good in the 6th I knew he was dead meat.

No doubt. The fight was over from the 6th round on. I can't believe Morales took so many shots, he should have been out of there in the 6th or 7th.

[flipside]

No doubt. The fight was over from the 6th round on. I can't believe Morales took so many shots, he should have been out of there in the 6th or 7th.

morales is a warrior you cant deny that

[xcaret]

So my advice to those Pac fans calling the Mexican fighters "bums and *******" = All you are doing is talking your boy down. Obviously by your logic, Pac has beaten NOBODY except bums.

Thats what they saying, "Pacquiao beat nothing but *******!" hahaah

[hellfire508]

morales is a warrior you cant deny that

It was pretty sad to watch. He kept trying to fight back, but he had nothing left. In the 10th, 99.9% of fighters would have stayed on the canvas after taking that much of a beating (99% of fighters wouldn't have made it to the 10th round), but he got up. It was just sad seeing a warrior like Morales getting beat up so bad, on the canvas for the first time etc. It was nearly as sad as Ali-Holmes.

[Chups]

LOL.............

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mV3jq...earch=pacquiao