-
-
Crawford doesn't deserve it. He shouldn't be higher than Canelo who has accomplished more. You can even debate with Thurman. As for eye test, he's not as skilled as Rigo or Loma.
These dudes are just following the hype so they could get more hits. That list isn't that great.Comment
-
At this point in time no one is #1 p4p. Everyone is barely starting to build a nice resume but that's about it. By the end of 2018 it well be more clear on who should be ranked p4p #1, until then that spot is emptyComment
-
Interestingly, golovkin has now been exposed 3 times "once by a ww" and they have him #2? Most certainly lomachenco is higher than him, so is Rigo by far. What an overrated bumComment
-
-
I agree with Crawford at #1 however I think the winner of Rigo vs Loma will be the next #1.
Also I don't get how people can say #1 should be empty. P4P is a made up imaginary thing. I agree nobody has distanced themselves from the pack but leaving #1 open just means #2 is the best in the world, therefore #1.Comment
-
This hype job is nowhere near p4p #1. He beat nobody of substance... hell even GGG has a better resume. No name Indongo, Felix Diaz, Postol, Burns, and blown up inactive Gamboa... such a great resume lol. He cleared out a garbage division with nobody of note. Gamboa buzzed him and gave him fits when he was inactive, blown up, and at a massive size advantage... lets see him fight some quality opposition at welterweight before crowning him anything but hype job.Comment
-
I don't have a problem with him sitting at the top but winner of Loma/Rigo deserves top honors in December.Comment
-
I have GGG as #1 and Crawford #2. So its whatever.
What's a joke is Inoue and especially Santa Cruz (who I always said is nothing special). What a ****ing joke.Comment
Tweet
Comment