"Luck is for the mediocre"

[bluepete]

It's funny how going into the fight triple g is p4p #1 ko artist MW king. After the fight he is 35. Like his age all the sudden plays a factor

Funny how before the fight he was a coward ducking soon to be destroyed hype job. Now after the fight where he wasn't destroyed hes actually still a hype job with no skills who age has no effect on.

[bluepete]

Can't tell the truth here man...people don't want to admit the guys skills were simply mediocre.

Why didn't Canelo take the titles then? The future of boxing can't do any better than that?

[BodiesInFlight]

so we can choose the pictures we show me??? because all can be done in reverse

[Robbie Barrett]

Before the fight = Golovkin has great footwork, a master of cutting off the ring. Canelo is slow, he's going to get beat up.

Now they're basically admitting Golovkins footwork isn't as good as they said.

[Metho_4u]

One guy came forward and made the fight. Canelo should've knocked out a 35 year old with no defence. Of course opinions matter. Even judging is an opinion. But the only card that scored for Canelo winning was universally seen as a joke. When Golovkin doesn't have a mark against Jacobs it counts for nothing. When he does against Canelo it suddenly counts? Hmm, yeah I think I get it..

You should get it considering all his fanboys were talking about "look at Jacob's face doe" "he swollen doe", golovkin looks like he got hit buy a fuggin truck, and it's "that doesn't win fights doe". And the score? You've got to be kidding me, if it were 115-113 Canelo, there wouldn't be near the same amount of crying. It's the Bradley effect all over.

[bluepete]

You should get it considering all his fanboys were talking about "look at Jacob's face doe" "he swollen doe", golovkin looks like he got hit buy a fuggin truck, and it's "that doesn't win fights doe". And the score? You've got to be kidding me, if it were 115-113 Canelo, there wouldn't be near the same amount of crying. It's the Bradley effect all over.

It seems like you can't be objective yourself because some of the Golovkin fans are abit ridiculous on here. Golovkin seems to be flamed just for having competitive fights with world class fighters. The Jacobs fight was close, but people on here acted like it was Chavez Whitaker. Now Golovkin looked to have done enough to have beaten the "future of boxing" and he's a bum who'll lose a rematch. And he is the age he is. Who didn't look worse at 35? If were talking Hopkins he didn't start until he was late twenties, no amateur fights, and really is an exception. I've never seen a pressure fighter who didn't regress by 35. You might hate Golovkin fanboys, but your hate for the fighter, who's tough, brave and seems humble enough to me is abit out of proportion don't you think?

[bluepete]

Before the fight = Golovkin has great footwork, a master of cutting off the ring. Canelo is slow, he's going to get beat up.

Now they're basically admitting Golovkins footwork isn't as good as they said.

Before the fight. Canelo's going to destroy Golovkin with bodyshots because Ward Kovalev.Now the superstar in he's prime is being lauded for scraping a draw.

[Metho_4u]

It seems like you can't be objective yourself because some of the Golovkin fans are abit ridiculous on here. Golovkin seems to be flamed just for having competitive fights with world class fighters. The Jacobs fight was close, but people on here acted like it was Chavez Whitaker. Now Golovkin looked to have done enough to have beaten the "future of boxing" and he's a bum who'll lose a rematch. And he is the age he is. Who didn't look worse at 35? If were talking Hopkins he didn't start until he was late twenties, no amateur fights, and really is an exception. I've never seen a pressure fighter who didn't regress by 35. You might hate Golovkin fanboys, but your hate for the fighter, who's tough, brave and seems humble enough to me is abit out of proportion don't you think?

How did he look vs Canelo though? Let's be unbiased here. Canelo looked imo far superior as far as skill goes. Had canelo not gassed, do you think the fight would've been close at all? Without bias, I really don't think he looked like he belonged in the same ring without him. He gassed and that's really the only thing that kept the fight close. That's my absolute honest opinion.

[Lester Tutor]

[Lester Tutor]

Before the fight = Golovkin has great footwork, a master of cutting off the ring. Canelo is slow, he's going to get beat up.

Now they're basically admitting Golovkins footwork isn't as good as they said.

Actually no they said his jab was going to be end of Alvarez and they also predicted a KO. That his jab is the best in the business...

But when his jabs are all missing and exposed they claim GGG was just probing and doesn’t count. Nobody performed for GGG. All time high worst compubox. However against Ouma he did rather slowly as well, with them Southpaws...

And people criticize Nelo vs Trout or Lara

Dogmatic Pacquiaoism. The bandwagoners can never be wrong