Some people actually believe the org rankings are more credible and less corrupt than "unofficial" rankings like TBRB's. Do you agree?
Are ORG rankings credible?
Collapse
-
Are ORG rankings credible?
5No, they are terrible100.00%5Yes, the WBA/WBC/WBO/IBF rankings arfe the best0.00%0Last edited by Robbie Barrett; 09-26-2017, 10:36 AM.Tags: None -
No. Only the opinions of certain nsb posters matter in regards to rankings
We should have our own ranking system -
Comment
-
Comment
-
Nah. Not all fighters are ranked with all orgs and champions from one org are typically not ranked with the others... those are the main problems but there's others - in some cases the rankings appear inexplicable but can be just the result of an obscure fringe contender getting an unexpected win, or perhaps orgs giving guys shots on the basis of winning regional titles etc, etc... the orgs' rankings are utter BS in short and that's even before you add the possibility of corruption into the mix.
Myself I think TBRB are about as good as it gets, though ultimately my own judgement is the deciding factor - cos, well, it just is.
'Cept for P4P.
P4P's just utter bollocks whoever does it, including me. So I don't.Comment
Comment