Comments Thread For: HBO's Lampley Explains: Golovkin is Slipping, He's Deteriorating

[Lomadeaux]

how the hell did he dominate?

"One man was the ocean, the other was the log." - Teddy

He won 8 rounds to 4. You can call it a clear victory if you want. But he won the fight CLEARLY.

[OmarRueben]

lil g lost to Jacobs & now Nelo. lil g ain't great & never was....so there goes the "slipping" excuse out the window.

I never said ggg was a great fighter. Jacobs took Golovkin to the limit as did Canelo in close fights but GGG wins. Jacobs and Canelo should meet up and let the BJ-GGG winner meet the winner.

[OmarRueben]

?????when????

GGG never get a Canelo decision in the US so might as well go fight BJ in the UK for the same money. No communist is welcome in America and even low Mex's get the breaks over commies.

[Sledgeweather17]

All fights put milage on the body. Even camps put milage on your body. Armchair critics known nothing about boxing. Nobody at 35 is as physically good as in their twenties but now you want to change biology to fit your hateful agenda. And now on to the next hero, Charlo, who's only beaten Trout, on points, and now he knocks out an undefeated middleweight with an iron chin off the back of a performance where he took 4 rounds to knock over a one legged man. We all know he beat Canelo. We all know you droned on about how he wouldn't. He is older and with age you lose speed and that's just a fact. Don't let your personal feelings about a man cloud your objectivity.

On the contrary I predicted a GGG victory to anyone who would listen. You can check my post history it's all there.

I thought he would dominate and stop Canelo, but he clearly lost coz Canelo took him to boxing school.

Mayweather was 36 when he schooled Canelo easily, but 35 year old Golovtard struggled against that same guy when he is younger than Mayweather was and has fought way less pro fights than Mayweather had at the time.

What does that tell you about Bumlovkin?

And if there's a hypocrite here then it's you, for crying about small, 40 year old Mayweather 'ducking' GGG then turning around and saying a 35 year old bum beater is over the hill.

Ps. Charlo was literally half blind when he fought Trout, he had to have an eye operation to fix his eyesight after the fight/before the Jrock fight. Also Trout is actually a slick defensive boxer, unlike 'easy to hit G.'

[Sledgeweather17]

Maybe it's a bit of both. But tell me, is he the only fighter who isn't allowed to slow down because of age because you don't like him?

You gone sit there and tell me with a straight face that it's just a mere coincidence that he 'starts slowing down' when the comp amps up?

[alexjust]

Mayweather was 36 when he schooled Canelo easily, but 35 year old Golovtard struggled against that same guy when he is younger than Mayweather was and has fought way less pro fights than Mayweather had at the time.

What does that tell you about Bumlovkin?

It doesn't tell me anything about GGG. It tells a lot about how Canelo improved though. GGG did not fight the same Canelo Floyd faught.

Bumlovkin? Just based on his amateur career he is no bum. You lose credibility as a biased hater when you say nonsense like this.

[DinoCop]

Yeah I get it....and we should also give our children "gender neutral" names so we dont force any gender on them, right?

Suck my eggs.

#TrumpNation

F you f hoomos f gender neutral shid f vegans f hipsters wtf you are mistaken me with? It's just anthropology. White refers to descendants of the germanic races.

[bluepete]

On the contrary I predicted a GGG victory to anyone who would listen. You can check my post history it's all there.

I thought he would dominate and stop Canelo, but he clearly lost coz Canelo took him to boxing school.

Mayweather was 36 when he schooled Canelo easily, but 35 year old Golovtard struggled against that same guy when he is younger than Mayweather was and has fought way less pro fights than Mayweather had at the time.

What does that tell you about Bumlovkin?

And if there's a hypocrite here then it's you, for crying about small, 40 year old Mayweather 'ducking' GGG then turning around and saying a 35 year old bum beater is over the hill.

Ps. Charlo was literally half blind when he fought Trout, he had to have an eye operation to fix his eyesight after the fight/before the Jrock fight. Also Trout is actually a slick defensive boxer, unlike 'easy to hit G.'

Canelo ran the whole fight against Golovkin, so obviously was harder to pin down than the stationary, inexperienced fighter Floyd fought. Styles make fights. No only that but the 152lb version of Canelo would never have lasted 12 the other night. As for reading your history, you need to read mine. Never once accused Floyd of ducking anyone, least of all Golovkin. So tear up your script because I dont fit on it. As for Charlo, have another look at him with two good eyes at middle against a guy with one leg. Then tell me where you spotted he's new superpowers at middle.

[bluepete]

You gone sit there and tell me with a straight face that it's just a mere coincidence that he 'starts slowing down' when the comp amps up?

So age just doesn't apply to him. Any other fighters you don't like who the usual rules of sport and boxing are not applicable to? Brook is a slick fighter for sure. You should go to the ingle gym and see how hard they all are to pin down. It's all they work on. Froch talks about sparring Brook and how it was the most frustrating day of he's life. Jacobs? I dont think he is this big step up. Pirog proved that. As for Canelo, he's meant to be a young superstar, and the majority of people feel he lost. He's tough and skillful, maybe nobody stops him. But Golovkins handspeed, while never he's strength, has clearly gotten slower. What shouldn't age effect him?

[bluepete]

Sports science has revealed, generally speaking, that the male physique hits the top of the bell curve around 33-34 years of age, and then begins to trend downwards.
It is not sudden, but inevitable currently. Exceptions include superior genetics, psychological toughness, focus, competitive spirit and good health.
For every B-Hop there are a thousand antipodes.
The exception to this is that 30 years ago 30 was considered old. Now it's an age where many fighters are running at title shots, and there is a surfeit of fighters now fighting into their early 40's.
Is this a result of improvements in sports science, new training techniques and better management of boxers lifestyles? Or has evolution made a small but discernable leap in a generation?

There are out of ring factors, brain damage factors and things that happen in camp. Everyone's different. Look at Chavez and Tyson in their 30s.If anyone claims they were still in there primes they'd get laughed out of the room.