Did your opinion change after watching the replay?

[Tony Trick-Pony]

My opinion didn't change. It was still a so-so fight.

[ironmt]

Scored It again tonight and had the same exact score of 8-4 GGG.

[boliodogs]

I still scored it 8 to 4 GGG just like the first time. I though Canelo lost many rounds by running too much and not fighting enough. He put up a good fight but he lost on both my first scorecard and on the replay. I could have scored it 9 to 3 for GGG. Some rounds were about even but judges aren't allowed to score even rounds anymore so I carefully chose a winner in each close round. GGG's accurate jab working overtime and his much higher punch volume and constantly forcing the fight won it for him on my score card.

[Robbie Barrett]

So, you don't know how sample sizes work. You only had to say so.

https://www.surveysystem.com/sscalc.htm

To work out a valid representation of the opinions of 50 million people, with a confidence level of 95% +/- 2, you only need 2,400 people.

That's ok man. A lot of people don't know that.

If only they used them for Brexit and the Trump election. Oh wait...........

[Lomasexual]

If only they used them for Brexit and the Trump election. Oh wait...........

Those were predictive polls. Which are totally different things.

But hey, if you just want to deny one of the cornerstones of most modern science, and almost all of modern medicine - just because you don't want to look silly on the internet - you will end up looking sillier.

I don't suppose you are going to back it up by refusing the assistance of modern medicine? No? Good, then stop being silly.

[Robbie Barrett]

Those were predictive polls. Which are totally different things.

But hey, if you just want to deny one of the cornerstones of most modern science, and almost all of modern medicine - just because you don't want to look silly on the internet - you will end up looking sillier.

I don't suppose you are going to back it up by refusing the assistance of modern medicine? No? Good, then stop being silly.

You're talking utter bollocks now. Keep claiming "Almost everyone around the world had Golovkin winning clearly" based on a few 1000 votes. If you go to Canelo's hometown and got a few thousand votes would that count as "everyone around the world" too?

[DrHouse579]

If only they used them for Brexit and the Trump election. Oh wait...........

Aaaaaand that's where Robbie loses the argument..

[Robbie Barrett]

Aaaaaand that's where Robbie loses the argument..

How so? By proving his claimed scientific sample calculator is bollocks?

[DrHouse579]

How so? By proving his claimed scientific sample calculator is bollocks?

By bringing up Trump and Brexit as counter-examples to statistics and demonstrating you have no idea what you're talking about.

[Robbie Barrett]

By bringing up Trump and Brexit as counter-examples to statistics and demonstrating you have no idea what you're talking about.

Did they not use massive sample sizes and the predictions were wrong?

He's trying to argue a few thousand votes can represent the opinion of every boxing fan around the world.