Did your opinion change after watching the replay?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Gate keeper
    Contender
    Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
    • Apr 2017
    • 485
    • 68
    • 1
    • 12,408

    #61
    Originally posted by koolkc107
    I switch a couple of rounds, giving Triple G the 4th while changing the 10th to a Canelo round.

    Got the same score, 7-5 Canelo.

    What's more, Golovkin looked EVEN MORE ineffective chasing Canelo than I'd remembered.

    All these Gennady folks who have it 116-112 or more lopsided look a lot like Adelaide Byrd to me.

    They clearly DKSAB...
    I never understand that statement DKSAB. There's no universal criteria for judging a boxing fight. Everyone may have different criteria. Bryd's card was terrible because there is no msinstream criteria for which you could have Canelo winning 10 rounds. I could easily see 116 - 112 though. The only rounds I thought Canelo won clearly was 2,3 and 12. Every other round either GGG won clearly or it was close. Canelo landed the cleaner more flashy power shots. But GGG landed way more jabs and occasional power shots. In rounds 10 and 11, to me, Canelo didn't enough land enough power shots to clearly win the round compared to the combination of power shots and jabs from GGG. Ones subjective opinion on these rounds of quality vs quantity will make all the difference in how you score it.

    Comment

    • Metho_4u
      Undisputed Champion
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Mar 2013
      • 7357
      • 211
      • 467
      • 18,920

      #62
      Originally posted by LoadedWraps

      Nope. I was coherent and scoring unbiased the first time around.

      8-4 Golovkin, after one viewing, or 40.
      Hahahahahahaha....hahahahahahahahahahahahahaha.

      Comment

      • koolkc107
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Nov 2012
        • 4251
        • 218
        • 3
        • 59,059

        #63
        Originally posted by Gate keeper
        I never understand that statement DKSAB. There's no universal criteria for judging a boxing fight. Everyone may have different criteria. Bryd's card was terrible because there is no msinstream criteria for which you could have Canelo winning 10 rounds. I could easily see 116 - 112 though. The only rounds I thought Canelo won clearly was 2,3 and 12. Every other round either GGG won clearly or it was close. Canelo landed the cleaner more flashy power shots. But GGG landed way more jabs and occasional power shots. In rounds 10 and 11, to me, Canelo didn't enough land enough power shots to clearly win the round compared to the combination of power shots and jabs from GGG. Ones subjective opinion on these rounds of quality vs quantity will make all the difference in how you score it.
        You have folks saying they don't get Byrd's card, yet score 8, or 9, or even 10 rounds for Golovkin.

        If it was that close, how does that happen either way?

        Hence, DKSAB.

        Comment

        • Metho_4u
          Undisputed Champion
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Mar 2013
          • 7357
          • 211
          • 467
          • 18,920

          #64
          Originally posted by Lomasexual
          Nope. I, like almost everyone else on the planet, scored it correctly for GGG.

          I'm not saying Canelo did badly. He did pretty good. He didn't get exposed or humiliated or demolished.

          But he clearly lost.
          Your buddy did, and the bum beater was also made to look ******...hardly landed a flush shot in the whole fight.

          Comment

          • Metho_4u
            Undisputed Champion
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Mar 2013
            • 7357
            • 211
            • 467
            • 18,920

            #65
            Originally posted by Robbie Barrett
            Thinking someone won and thinking someone won clearly are 2 different things. When are any fans happy with draws?

            OK Mr statistics. How many people around the world saw the fight, how many of those thought Golovkin won? You are so certain on your statistics.
            You mean NSB polls aren't accurate!!!!?

            Comment

            • Canelo and GGG
              NSB's Golden Boy
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Sep 2016
              • 4582
              • 106
              • 92
              • 15,725

              #66
              Originally posted by LoadedWraps

              Nope. I was coherent and scoring unbiased the first time around.

              8-4 Golovkin, after one viewing, or 40.
              there is no such thing as unbiased scoring

              Comment

              • koolkc107
                Undisputed Champion
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Nov 2012
                • 4251
                • 218
                • 3
                • 59,059

                #67
                Originally posted by Metho_4u
                Your buddy did, and the bum beater was also made to look ******...hardly landed a flush shot in the whole fight.
                THAT'S the big point.

                How do you win a fight where you hardly land anything big all night?

                Comment

                • Metho_4u
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Mar 2013
                  • 7357
                  • 211
                  • 467
                  • 18,920

                  #68
                  Originally posted by koolkc107
                  THAT'S the big point.

                  How do you win a fight where you hardly land anything big all night?
                  You don't, and if people want to use activity vs Canelo only fighting in spurts and call it even? I'm completely fine with that.

                  Activity-golovkin
                  CLEAN EFFECTIVE punching-Canelo
                  Defense-Canelo
                  Aggressor-more golovkin, but not effective
                  Ring generalship? I don't think either was able to establish dominance in that area- Draw

                  Comment

                  • Sp0rty Cr@ig
                    Interim Champion
                    Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                    • Oct 2011
                    • 728
                    • 34
                    • 23
                    • 7,187

                    #69
                    Lol most the guys saying "Canelo 7-5" have a post history that is highly negative of GGG. Any unbiased fan score it for Canelo?

                    Me I didnt score the fight round by round but it was a close fight. Was not surprised by the decision except for that one card

                    Comment

                    • reneg_2
                      EL GRAN CAMPEON
                      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                      • Jan 2009
                      • 1264
                      • 43
                      • 10
                      • 29,719

                      #70
                      7-5 Canelo. And pretty clear to me.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP