Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Did your opinion change after watching the replay?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    Originally posted by koolkc107 View Post
    I switch a couple of rounds, giving Triple G the 4th while changing the 10th to a Canelo round.

    Got the same score, 7-5 Canelo.

    What's more, Golovkin looked EVEN MORE ineffective chasing Canelo than I'd remembered.

    All these Gennady folks who have it 116-112 or more lopsided look a lot like Adelaide Byrd to me.

    They clearly DKSAB...
    I never understand that statement DKSAB. There's no universal criteria for judging a boxing fight. Everyone may have different criteria. Bryd's card was terrible because there is no msinstream criteria for which you could have Canelo winning 10 rounds. I could easily see 116 - 112 though. The only rounds I thought Canelo won clearly was 2,3 and 12. Every other round either GGG won clearly or it was close. Canelo landed the cleaner more flashy power shots. But GGG landed way more jabs and occasional power shots. In rounds 10 and 11, to me, Canelo didn't enough land enough power shots to clearly win the round compared to the combination of power shots and jabs from GGG. Ones subjective opinion on these rounds of quality vs quantity will make all the difference in how you score it.

    Comment


    • #62
      Originally posted by LoadedWraps View Post

      Nope. I was coherent and scoring unbiased the first time around.

      8-4 Golovkin, after one viewing, or 40.
      Hahahahahahaha....hahahahahahahahahahahahahaha.

      Comment


      • #63
        Originally posted by Gate keeper View Post
        I never understand that statement DKSAB. There's no universal criteria for judging a boxing fight. Everyone may have different criteria. Bryd's card was terrible because there is no msinstream criteria for which you could have Canelo winning 10 rounds. I could easily see 116 - 112 though. The only rounds I thought Canelo won clearly was 2,3 and 12. Every other round either GGG won clearly or it was close. Canelo landed the cleaner more flashy power shots. But GGG landed way more jabs and occasional power shots. In rounds 10 and 11, to me, Canelo didn't enough land enough power shots to clearly win the round compared to the combination of power shots and jabs from GGG. Ones subjective opinion on these rounds of quality vs quantity will make all the difference in how you score it.
        You have folks saying they don't get Byrd's card, yet score 8, or 9, or even 10 rounds for Golovkin.

        If it was that close, how does that happen either way?

        Hence, DKSAB.

        Comment


        • #64
          Originally posted by Lomasexual View Post
          Nope. I, like almost everyone else on the planet, scored it correctly for GGG.

          I'm not saying Canelo did badly. He did pretty good. He didn't get exposed or humiliated or demolished.

          But he clearly lost.
          Your buddy did, and the bum beater was also made to look ******...hardly landed a flush shot in the whole fight.

          Comment


          • #65
            Originally posted by Robbie Barrett View Post
            Thinking someone won and thinking someone won clearly are 2 different things. When are any fans happy with draws?

            OK Mr statistics. How many people around the world saw the fight, how many of those thought Golovkin won? You are so certain on your statistics.
            You mean NSB polls aren't accurate!!!!?

            Comment


            • #66
              Originally posted by LoadedWraps View Post

              Nope. I was coherent and scoring unbiased the first time around.

              8-4 Golovkin, after one viewing, or 40.
              there is no such thing as unbiased scoring

              Comment


              • #67
                Originally posted by Metho_4u View Post
                Your buddy did, and the bum beater was also made to look ******...hardly landed a flush shot in the whole fight.
                THAT'S the big point.

                How do you win a fight where you hardly land anything big all night?

                Comment


                • #68
                  Originally posted by koolkc107 View Post
                  THAT'S the big point.

                  How do you win a fight where you hardly land anything big all night?
                  You don't, and if people want to use activity vs Canelo only fighting in spurts and call it even? I'm completely fine with that.

                  Activity-golovkin
                  CLEAN EFFECTIVE punching-Canelo
                  Defense-Canelo
                  Aggressor-more golovkin, but not effective
                  Ring generalship? I don't think either was able to establish dominance in that area- Draw

                  Comment


                  • #69
                    Lol most the guys saying "Canelo 7-5" have a post history that is highly negative of GGG. Any unbiased fan score it for Canelo?

                    Me I didnt score the fight round by round but it was a close fight. Was not surprised by the decision except for that one card

                    Comment


                    • #70
                      7-5 Canelo. And pretty clear to me.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP