What IF GGG vs ALVAREZ Rematch BECOMES A DRAW AGAIN!?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Lester Tutor
    Banned
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • May 2015
    • 17673
    • 365
    • 253
    • 22,224

    #1

    What IF GGG vs ALVAREZ Rematch BECOMES A DRAW AGAIN!?

    Let's say Max DeLuca scores Alvarez beating Golovkin 116-112, another judge scores a Steve Weisfeld for GGG at 115-113, and Glen Feldman scores it 114-114.

    Will the GGG fans cry again about corrupt officials? Or Gennady has bottled because realistically hes been a 168 fighter for quite some time and a 154 fighter taxed his ass?
  • Zaryu
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Nov 2010
    • 3087
    • 177
    • 426
    • 31,274

    #2
    Then it's another successful title defense for him. Also, Canelo is no 154lbs fighter and GGG is not a 168lbs fighter. Two middleweights fought, one was accused of having a padded record, and the younger guy in his prime with a "proven" record couldn't beat him and seems hesitant to rematch the older "over rated" champion.

    Comment

    • bronx7
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Mar 2010
      • 4503
      • 80
      • 0
      • 17,479

      #3
      He taxed his mothers CUn& lost 8/4 you fake fan every expert had ggg winning hbo espn atlas roach multiple trainers fighters your a idiot taxed your ass and you liked it

      Comment

      • Lopez_Boxing
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Jan 2017
        • 4655
        • 245
        • 81
        • 97,428

        #4
        The problem is, GGG fans claimed he was just going to demolish Canelo. Spark him. That didn't happen and it turned out to be a good competive fight. Now they just can't admit they were wrong. So it's, "golovkin didn't purposely go to the body", "robbery", "golovkin didn't hit him as hard as he could".. Pathetic really. Face it there's 3 options:
        1. Golovkin isn't as good as you thought
        2.canelo is better than you thought
        3.both elite fighters of this era

        Close fight yes. Robbery it was not.

        Comment

        • Mequetrefe
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Oct 2016
          • 1274
          • 56
          • 0
          • 14,670

          #5
          Originally posted by Mirko Troll Cop
          Let's say Max DeLuca scores Alvarez beating Golovkin 116-112, another judge scores a Steve Weisfeld for GGG at 115-113, and Glen Feldman scores it 114-114.

          Will the GGG fans cry again about corrupt officials? Or Gennady has bottled because realistically hes been a 168 fighter for quite some time and a 154 fighter taxed his ass?
          No such thing will happen bruh. You know damn well Canelo will be asking for an easier fight and hope GGG gets older again. He said there are other fights at 160 at the post fight press conference, he dont want another trip to "War"zakstan. That boy got his a$$ so whopped he is not even interested in rematch talks. "He won the fight doe". Ok, so if he "Won" why is he hesitant to do it again????????? Them jabs gave him a concussion, that boy looks sad bruh.

          Comment

          • Zaryu
            Undisputed Champion
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Nov 2010
            • 3087
            • 177
            • 426
            • 31,274

            #6
            Originally posted by Lopez_Boxing
            The problem is, GGG fans claimed he was just going to demolish Canelo. Spark him. That didn't happen and it turned out to be a good competive fight. Now they just can't admit they were wrong. So it's, "golovkin didn't purposely go to the body", "robbery", "golovkin didn't hit him as hard as he could".. Pathetic really. Face it there's 3 options:
            1. Golovkin isn't as good as you thought
            2.canelo is better than you thought
            3.both elite fighters of this era

            Close fight yes. Robbery it was not.
            I agree with most of this post, the other side has also made ridiculous claims, however, GGG has been showing signs of slowing down for a minute now. Which makes me think we can't conclude GGG wasn't as good as we thought. If anything, in spite of slowing down and being 35, he's still hanging on to his belts against elite competition e.g. Danny Jacobs and Canelo.

            Option #3 seems like the best answer for me, with it confirming that if a past it GGG is still good enough to beat the top guys, the competition did him a serious disservice in avoiding him for the longest time.

            Comment

            • Lester Tutor
              Banned
              Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
              • May 2015
              • 17673
              • 365
              • 253
              • 22,224

              #7
              Originally posted by Zaryu
              Then it's another successful title defense for him. Also, Canelo is no 154lbs fighter and GGG is not a 168lbs fighter. Two middleweights fought, one was accused of having a padded record, and the younger guy in his prime with a "proven" record couldn't beat him and seems hesitant to rematch the older "over rated" champion.
              Gennady still looked bigger than Alvarez, and that Alvarez was bigger than the Angulo or Smith fight... therefore, if Nelo is a "Middleweight" (which he NOW is), and GGG and Jacobs both size up, then that means GGG is a big Middleweight!

              Comment

              • Lester Tutor
                Banned
                Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                • May 2015
                • 17673
                • 365
                • 253
                • 22,224

                #8
                Originally posted by bronx7
                He taxed his mothers CUn& lost 8/4 you fake fan every expert had ggg winning hbo espn atlas roach multiple trainers fighters your a idiot taxed your ass and you liked it
                JCC and Erik Morales had Alvarez winning!

                Comment

                • Lester Tutor
                  Banned
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • May 2015
                  • 17673
                  • 365
                  • 253
                  • 22,224

                  #9
                  Originally posted by Lopez_Boxing
                  The problem is, GGG fans claimed he was just going to demolish Canelo. Spark him. That didn't happen and it turned out to be a good competive fight. Now they just can't admit they were wrong. So it's, "golovkin didn't purposely go to the body", "robbery", "golovkin didn't hit him as hard as he could".. Pathetic really. Face it there's 3 options:
                  1. Golovkin isn't as good as you thought
                  2.canelo is better than you thought
                  3.both elite fighters of this era

                  Close fight yes. Robbery it was not.
                  We should revisit the NSB Pickem polls for what GGG's expectancy was to be.

                  Comment

                  • TheBigLug
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Jun 2017
                    • 4047
                    • 186
                    • 0
                    • 19,042

                    #10
                    Well if it's genuinely a draw then so be it.

                    If there's another robbery then it's a different matter altogether.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP