The trolls justification thread

[koolkc107]

And just like you were wrong then, you are wrong now.

Both fights were close, but in both these fights the fighter you guys have been hating on and calling overrated won in the eyes of everybody other than you and a few judges, got robbed and the 'home' fighter and their fake image was saved by incompetent jugdes..

Hence why you're here, saying what you are.

In the rematch Canelo might beat GGG, who knows, but GGG won the first fight, just like Kovalev won the first fights against Ward. Him losing the rematch (don't even get me started on that) does not erase the fact that he won the first fight, just like Canelo winning the rematch won't erase the fact that he lost the first fight.

Simple as that.

Kova is still on my top 10 P4P list in spite of losing twice.

I sure must really hate the guy to keep him there.

And BTW, with Ward retiring, I wouldn't be shocked if he gets back in the top 5 VERY SOON.

Kova is legit.

I am here saying what I am saying because it's a fact that so many times, sportswriters are fanboys too and just like fanboys they get things wrong thinking and seeing with their hearts instead of their eyes and brains.

Don't believe me.

What you should do is watch the Murray and Lemieux fights then compare then to the Jacobs and Canelo fights.

Might be the only way you realize exactly what has happened to your guy the last 2 fights.

[Szef]

Kova is still on my top 10 P4P list in spite of losing twice.

I sure must really hate the guy to keep him there.

And BTW, with Ward retiring, I wouldn't be shocked if he gets back in the top 5 VERY SOON.

Kova is legit.

I am here saying what I am saying because it's a fact that so many times, sportswriters are fanboys too and just like fanboys they get things wrong thinking and seeing with their hearts instead of their eyes and brains.

Don't believe me.

What you should do is watch the Murray and Lemieux fights then compare then to the Jacobs and Canelo fights.

Might be the only way you realize exactly what has happened to your guy the last 2 fights.

He fought the two other than himself the best MWs in the world and he didn't win as dominant as he did in the past.

But he still won.

You're making my case here - Golovkin doesn't knocks out his opponent and utterly dominates them like he used to means he's overrated and that he lost the fight. LMAO.

So what he outlanded Canelo in 10 out 12 rounds? So what he was the aggresor the entire time? So what Canelo fought in spurts and wasn't doing anything else for the rest of the round - Golovkin didn't annihilate him, he's overrated like I said he is and lost like I said he would!

lol......