Golovkin-canelo ppv did “significantly above” 1 million...

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • T-1000
    Contender
    Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
    • Aug 2017
    • 366
    • 31
    • 17
    • 14,312

    #1

    Golovkin-canelo ppv did “significantly above” 1 million...

    Trusted by champions since 1910. Boxing gloves, punching bags, training apparel & more – built to last.


    GGG is no draw doe.
  • ThatDude44
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Mar 2013
    • 3484
    • 175
    • 180
    • 28,546

    #2
    Adalaide Byrd definitely agrees he's a "draw".

    Comment

    • The Big Dunn
      Banned
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Sep 2009
      • 69275
      • 9,488
      • 7,834
      • 287,568

      #3
      Originally posted by ThatDude44
      Adalaide Byrd definitely agrees he's a "draw".
      ba dum dum chhhhhh

      Comment

      • CatchAndShoot
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Feb 2014
        • 3534
        • 257
        • 202
        • 17,533

        #4
        Hell yeah, it was obvious the way the fight was trending online, and all the pre fight hype, even with the Floyd/Mac fight. In fact, I actually think the Floyd/Mac fight helped out this fight, promotion wise, because people were talking about how this is the real fight, while the other one was a circuits act.

        It was the narrative going into both fights.

        Comment

        • BoxingFan85
          THE DEFECATION TEAM
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Apr 2016
          • 8728
          • 366
          • 338
          • 167,010

          #5
          Originally posted by ThatDude44
          Adalaide Byrd definitely agrees he's a "draw".
          get your facts right bruh.. She proved he is the B side, only Don Trella agreed that he is a draw..

          Comment

          • Metho_4u
            Undisputed Champion
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Mar 2013
            • 7357
            • 211
            • 467
            • 18,920

            #6
            I see nothing about numbers in searching Google

            Comment

            • j.razor
              Undisputed Champion
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Jun 2007
              • 23786
              • 265
              • 0
              • 227,586,034

              #7
              I predicted 1.1 & the May/Mac I predicted 3. Did we even get those results in?

              Comment

              • MDPopescu
                Undisputed Champion
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Oct 2012
                • 24153
                • 1,504
                • 2,009
                • 4,138,611

                #8
                ... tbh: Canelo sold these numbers (whatever they will be)...

                Comment

                • Thraxox
                  Banned
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Sep 2016
                  • 9363
                  • 339
                  • 56
                  • 112,604

                  #9
                  Originally posted by MDPopescu
                  ... tbh: Canelo sold these numbers (whatever they will be)...
                  Cnaelo-Cotto did 900,000 PPV.

                  And this is probably at the high 1,700,000. Either GGG did something in this PPV or he did not.

                  Comment

                  • MDPopescu
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Oct 2012
                    • 24153
                    • 1,504
                    • 2,009
                    • 4,138,611

                    #10
                    Originally posted by Thraxox
                    Cnaelo-Cotto did 900,000 PPV.

                    And this is probably at the high 1,700,000. Either GGG did something in this PPV or he did not.
                    OK, I understand... but I think "significantly above 1 million" can't mean that figure you put down... because they would have said "significantly above 1.5 million" instead...

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP