[PLEASE HELP!] WHY Is IT THAT ONLY 🇲🇽 FANS ARE OK WITH THE FIGHT BEING A DRAW???

[Robbie Barrett]

Oh, you took me off of Ignore? I thought It was pretty clear, as did the majority of press row score cards.

You have no problem using compubox In an attempt to argue a win for Canelo, so how about this.

According to ESPN, the Filipino landed 182 out of 573 punches (32%), and Horn scored with just 92 of his 625 attempts (15%). Pacquiao also edged him in the power punches, landing 123 out of 380 shots (32%) to Horn’s 73 out of 428 (15%).

Is compubox only accurate when It benefits your favorite fighters? Why do you think that 95% of the people that watched the fight had Pacquiao winning?

OMFG. I made a thread showing Compubox counting punches that didn't land in Canelo-Golovkin fight.

[Robbie Barrett]

LMAO, I spoke to soon. I just went to reply to another post by Robbie Barrett and I am back on the ignore list. I guess he didn't appreciate my post above.

I never took you off ignore. I don't want people that deflect off topic like you do in my threads.

[ironmt]

I never took you off ignore. I don't want people that deflect off topic like you do in my threads.

I am clearly on topic. You just don't like what you hear.

[travestyny]

"it was a close fight", "i had canelo winning"..

what happen to the "challenger must take the belt away from the champion"?? canelo sure didnt take the belt from ggg. canelo fought to survive not to win.

I hate that cliche. All the challenger has to do is take more rounds from the champ to win. A championship fight is scored the same way as a non-championship fight

but people is saying this was a close fight with lots of close rounds. so in this case, close rounds has to go to the champion, correct? nobody dominated anyone here.

Same. With the scoring criteria being hazy enough as is, are we supposed to factor in an advantage for the belt holder? How much advantage do we factor in? Does he win every 10/10 round? Or, does he get an extra 5 punches of credit in ea round? What are we talking about here? People say that chiche when looking back on a fight, but it just doesn't work with the 10 point must system.

Scoring is already such a hot button issue, blurring the criteria even more is not what we need.

There is no advantage for the champion other than retaining the belt in the case of a draw. That's what "take the title from the champion" has always meant, and somewhere down the line it got swayed into people thinking it means there is some advantage given to the champion.

The advantage is ONLY that the champion keeps his belts in the event of a draw, which is what happened here.

[McNulty]

I've noticed this trend, that only 🇲🇽 boxing fans are the ones claiming it was really a "draw" and that Golovkin didn't dominate that fight like 90% of the boxing world saw.

It's called racial bias.

[Robbie Barrett]

I am clearly on topic. You just don't like what you hear.

No you deflect and don't know what you're talking about, as shown in this thread by you claiming i was using Compubox as evidence Canelo won.

[travestyny]

I've noticed this trend, that only 🇲🇽 boxing fans are the ones claiming it was really a "draw" and that Golovkin didn't dominate that fight like 90% of the boxing world saw.

Dude, you are obsessed with race (in this case, I guess technically Nationality). It's all you ever post about. Relax with all that, homie.

In any event, I'm not Mexican, and I'm fine with it being a draw.

[FrankieClutch]

but people is saying this was a close fight with lots of close rounds. so in this case, close rounds has to go to the champion, correct? nobody dominated anyone here.

I agree that no one dominated anyone, but a close round shouldn't go to the champ just because it was close.

[FrankieClutch]

Same. With the scoring criteria being hazy enough as is, are we supposed to factor in an advantage for the belt holder? How much advantage do we factor in? Does he win every 10/10 round? Or, does he get an extra 5 punches of credit in ea round? What are we talking about here? People say that chiche when looking back on a fight, but it just doesn't work with the 10 point must system.

Scoring is already such a hot button issue, blurring the criteria even more is not what we need.

Exactly! Then champs would just be trying to do enough to win the round because they know they're going to get the nod based on effort, which would make scoring more unreliable

[jsmith_tsu]

Thread Backfire "peeleft:

: