If Jacobs is a B level fighter then is Canelo a C level fighter?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Sheldon312
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Apr 2016
    • 2650
    • 165
    • 65
    • 33,229

    #21
    Originally posted by sunny31
    Your logic, posts, threads, and general existence on NSB is idiotic. Explain that?
    Answer my question who on Crawford's resume is better the PQ

    Comment

    • Papa Smurf
      Banned
      Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
      • May 2016
      • 328
      • 87
      • 12
      • 8,060

      #22
      That gif is of the cleanest jabs GGG landed the entire fight cong****

      Comment

      • BoxingIsGreat
        The Champ
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Feb 2009
        • 19470
        • 1,684
        • 2,397
        • 1,062,888

        #23
        I'd agree with you that Jacobs is a B, B- fighter, in the same category as Golovkin. Canelo is better, with a B+. These days, there aren't really any truly great/elite A or A+ fighters anymore (with the exception of maybe Andre Ward).

        I'm not counting the up and comers like Spence, Usyk, Crawford, Davis, etc.. They still have a lot more to prove.

        Comment

        • Sheldon312
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Apr 2016
          • 2650
          • 165
          • 65
          • 33,229

          #24
          Originally posted by BoxingIsGreat
          I'd agree with you that Jacobs is a B, B- fighter, in the same category as Golovkin. Canelo is better, with a B+. These days, there aren't really any truly great/elite A or A+ fighters anymore (with the exception of maybe Andre Ward).

          I'm not counting the up and comers like Spence, Usyk, Crawford, Davis, etc.. They still have a lot more to prove.
          That's understandable. I feel we use the 'eye test' a little too much without using resume.

          Comment

          Working...
          TOP