Robert Garcia - Agrees with Draw, Canelo KOs GGG in Rematch

[Madison Boxing]

'canelo kos ggg in the rematch' yeah thats a really credible, well thought out prediction based on the first fight. He literally couldnt have landed a better shot than that right hand and it didnt leave a dent on golovkin, but yeah he'll knock him out next time!!!!

[Robbie Barrett]

This wasnt GGG preparing for a mega fight. Just like the Canelo who was seriously hurt from Jose Cotto wasnt preparing for a superfight. And your opinion is useless here. You are obsessive/compulsive 24/7 over your hate for GGG.

You're comparing a 20 year old fighter with a 29 year old fighter. The current Golovkin is better than when he was 29 or younger. Your argument that a 27 year old Golovkin would be favoured is ******ed. YOU FAIL.

[richardt]

you could put up a poll that says who wins in a fight GGG or Grizzly bear and just because a flock of GGG stans vote for him don't make it so. So leave the ****** polls and his fanboys out of this. My point is simple at age 27 GGG was fighting lord knows who overseas. He didn't reach the national level until like 5 years ago and up until a year or so ago he wasn't fighting top fighters. But the moment he steps up his level of competition he starting too look bad and now it's because of age? Sorry I don't buy it. Maybe if he was fighting top guys and not guys on house release at 27 I would buy it. The age BS is just the excuse for why the moment he fought guys with a pulse he started looking ordinary. But up until a year a ago NOBODY complained about his age now the man aged 45 years in 12 months. not buying it
For all we know he looks exactly like this at age 27 if he fought Brook, Jacobs, Canelo back to back instead of Larry, Moe and Curly.

Again, it is a combination of age and GGG stepping up. That is being unbiased. Anyone can see that. And your aging 45 years and the Grizzly comments are such an exaggeration and fantasy that it wipes out everything you say. I guarantee a poll would overwhelmingly support that a 35 year old Canelo gets badly beaten by a 27 year old GGG. This is not about a debate between you and me, a poll will prove this. In fact, count on a poll by this weekend. The masses will have spoken, period.

[LockardTheGOAT]

Robert Garcia thinks that because he's a bea*er just like Canelo. No surprise.

[richardt]

You're comparing a 20 year old fighter with a 29 year old fighter. The current Golovkin is better than when he was 29 or younger. Your argument that a 27 year old Golovkin would be favoured is ******ed. YOU FAIL.

WRONG!! I'm talking about a THIRTY FIVE year old Canelo!! ANYONE knows a 27 year old GGG would be hugely favored over a 35 year old Canelo! Canelo's stamina at 35 would be WORSE than it is now fool!!! Epic fail on your part!

[DuckAdonis]

And i agree with Garcia and i'm not mexican

[bigdunny1]

You're comparing a 20 year old fighter with a 29 year old fighter. The current Golovkin is better than when he was 29 or younger. Your argument that a 27 year old Golovkin would be favoured is ******ed. YOU FAIL.

great point I don't think anyone considers him at his peak at 27 he wasn't even fighting dog shyt competition until 5 years ago. before that this dude was fighting lower then dog shyt would get iced by any top guys the fact that he had some struggles with bums at 29 proves it. Like I said the entire premise is pretty ****** on many levels many consider GGG reaching his peak late 2015 early 2016. But as soon as this guy who nobody called too old started facing top level guys he got old real quick lol starting with Brook fight to now he aged 100 years in 12 months at the same time he finally fought someone with a pulse. Convenient how that happens right. LOL

[Robbie Barrett]

WRONG!! I'm talking about a THIRTY FIVE year old Canelo!! ANYONE knows a 27 year old GGG would be hugely favored over a 35 year old Canelo! Canelo's stamina at 35 would be WORSE than it is now fool!!! Epic fail on your part!

We don't know how a 35 year old Canelo will look. We know what a younger Golovkin looked like. He was struggling with a 33 year old Super Welterweight that had lost 5 of his last 7 fights.

[richardt]

We don't know how a 35 year old Canelo will look. We know what a younger Golovkin looked like. He was struggling with a 33 year old Welterweight that had lost 5 of his last 7 fights.

That has nothing to do with GGG fighting a 35 year old Canelo, or how GGG would prepare for the top fighter in the division compared to an Ouma. Canelo's stamina would be FAR worse at 35 and that is pure common sense, and we can take this to a poll on the weekend and see how many people agree.

[richardt]

great point I don't think anyone considers him at his peak at 27 he wasn't even fighting dog shyt competition until 5 years ago. before that this dude was fighting lower then dog shyt would get iced by any top guys the fact that he had some struggles with bums at 29 proves it. Like I said the entire premise is pretty ****** on many levels many consider GGG reaching his peak late 2015 early 2016. But as soon as this guy who nobody called too old started facing top level guys he got old real quick lol starting with Brook fight to now he aged 100 years in 12 months at the same time he finally fought someone with a pulse. Convenient how that happens right. LOL

The point flew way over your head. Nothing you said grasps that fact that I wasnt talking about a 27 year old GGG fighting the best in the world, I said how he would fair against a 35 year old Canelo and I guarantee you an overwhelming number of people would pick GGG to beat a 35 year old Canelo, ESPECIALLY with his stamina issues at 35. You went off on an unrelated tangent and drove right off the cliff totally oblivious to the fact that I wasnt talking about GGG's prime or him against top fighters when he was 27. I was talking about Canelo at THIRTY FIVE YEARS OLD.