Comments Thread For: Gassiev: Golovkin Should Target Saunders Instead of Rematch

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Sledgeweather17
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Jun 2015
    • 3587
    • 154
    • 5
    • 34,855

    #111
    Originally posted by DblLFThooK
    Hypothetically lets say canelo fights Lemieux and loses. What conclusions will made from that result?
    There is no way Lemule beats any of the top dogs at ANY division that he decides to campaign at. There is a reason he doesn't have any legitimate names on his resume, by resume meaning victories of course, dunno why people put losses on resumes, it aint like you can apply for a job by putting a qualification that you dropped out of on your resume, the same should apply here.

    His claim to fame is getting dominated and knocked out by GGG. Nothing special about that.

    Comment

    • j.razor
      Undisputed Champion
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Jun 2007
      • 23786
      • 265
      • 0
      • 227,586,034

      #112
      Originally posted by Dasmius Shinobi
      Canelo have a chance to win the rematch, working the body of Golovkin more and increase his stamina. Golovkin have a chance to win the rematch, blocking some body shots of Canelo, working the body of Canelo and more pressure, Golovkin head hunting is not going to be effective in the rematch. Overall, I give more chance to Canelo, if Golovkin fight the same in the rematch. About Jermall Charlo, I am sorry, but he need to fight Jacobs to prove himself first. Maybe, Jermall Charlo is the real deal. I want Andrade to prove himself more in the 160 lbs, Fox was a Bum.
      So then why have we had multiple times where champions move up in weight to fight other champions in the next division? So Jermall isn't allowed to be a champ at 154 then move up to fight the champ at 160? Since hbo & lots on this site want to put lil g as an ATG then its time to feed him to the wolves....How about lil g has to prove himself?

      Comment

      Working...
      TOP