Hatton wants to get back into the "win" column it appears

[Cletus Funk]

Whats your job title?

"Professional sponge"

Nah, he's a mobile ***** bank.

[Guest]

Nah, he's a mobile ***** bank.

LOL! That really was a LOL as well, Frankie!

[Manfredo Jr]

did you used to do boxing when you were younger anorak or was it too ruff for you

[armani_model]

Nah, he's a mobile ***** bank.

Nah he is a bouncer and G.A.Y....(a gay club)

soz i dnt even kno the guy but i just felt to get that one in...

[BLOODSHED]

Basically, you just admitted you're unemployed.

That's what it comes down to.

But, the point is, you came in a thread to defend Hatton then backed up from defending him.

Sigh.

I thought so. I tried to engage you in a civil discussion, and because you can't actually think of anything to say, you go back to insults.

35 going on 15. Yeah, because you're so mature.

What do I do for a living? - So non it's been thrown out of the sequitur club.

spamming threads - no, that's you and the Wlad threads.

unfunny avatars - because you're such a good barometer of what humour is, right?


Ketchup Cornflakes - eaten

Ingrowing toenails - stamped on

Liver - punched in

[EXIGE]

Nah, he's a mobile ***** bank.

Turned mobile punchbagforfratbuddies.

[Guest]

did you used to do boxing when you were younger anorak or was it too ruff for you

Relevance?

[MR. V]

o no, ur not a consumer either right? u slaughter ur own food, make ur clothes and shelter, and this computer ur using was built from scratch.

And if they like the music, i dont see why it matters if they buy it. i doubt they buy it just to fit it, becuase nobodies that big a *** anymore.

well said, i already hit this lil youngster up with bad k. ***in young buks. get a life chump.


ps. good k for u.

[Guest]

Basically, you just admitted you're unemployed.

That's what it comes down to.

I love the way because you ain't got **** on me you have to invent stuff all the time. WHEN did I say I was unemployed? Did the voices in your head say this??? I have a good job, thanks for your interest.

But, the point is, you came in a thread to defend Hatton then backed up from defending him

This is why I never bother to discuss **** with you, because you're just so thick you read what you want to read. I came in to read the thread, I explained WHY I "defended" Hatton... and when did I "back up" from defending him????



Incidentally, I was just looking at this story on the BBC and the fight's at 147 so I don't know where the "moving back down" bit came from in this thread...

[EXIGE]

Relevance?

Hahaha, this is hilarious... Here...