THURMAN is overrated. spence will KO HIM.
Why is Canelo and Spence considered special but Thurman is not.
Collapse
-
What does Spence do better outside of cutting off the ring and jabThurman may be the more athletically gifted fighter over spence and canelo but his overall boxing talent is inferior. His skills and technique arent on par with those guys.
He is an ambush fighter who only shows bursts of action kinda like david Haye. He may be fast and fleet footed but dont mistake that with footwork. He doesnt have footwork which is why he just runs around to avoid punches. He has no defense.
Thurman wont lastComment
-
Canelo would also Fold Spence when he lands an overhand right on his chin. Spence got rocked multiple times by Brook.Comment
-
Outside of having a jab and knowing how to cut off the ring, his offense is more dynamic and consistent. Spence is much more fundamentally sound and all those attributes makes him a better fighter. H2H, Spence would beat him via clear decision. I don't say KO because Thurman will get on his bike like a chump and it would be nearly impossible at that point to catch him flush.
Spence is on another level.Comment
-
Canelo is the same height of Spence but much thicker and stronger. If Brook can wobble and back Spence up Canelo could do much much more damage. It took Spence 11 rounds to beat an already compramized fighter who GGG destroyed in 5. And Canelo went the distance against GGG. Canelo would hurt Spence badly. It might be even a remake of Angulo in which Spence eats flush after flush of hard counters.Comment

Comment