Canelo won the fight

[Banko Villas]

You haven't answered my question. I asked you, what criteria did you use to come to the conclusion that Canelo Alvarez won the fight?

You didn't accept my answer. I answered you what criteria I used to come to the conclusion that Canelo Alvarez won the fight. He won more rounds, landed better punches and Golovkin did nothing but chase him around while eating uppercuts and doing no damage on his own.

[Citizen Koba]

Which rounds did you see Golovkin win?

Why? Are you likely to change your opinion?

[Mr Objecitivity]

You didn't accept my answer. I answered you what criteria I used to come to the conclusion that Canelo Alvarez won the fight. He won more rounds, landed better punches and Golovkin did nothing but chase him around while eating uppercuts and doing no damage on his own.

Okay. So answer these questions then:

1) How did you come to the conclusion that he won more rounds?

2) How did you come to the conclusion that he landed better
punches on Golovkin than vice versa?

3) Do you think Canelo Alvarez inflicted more damage on
Golovkin than vice versa?

You provided me with some of your personal conclusions in regards to the fight. However, you haven't provided the criteria you've used to come to those conclusions. Claiming 'Canelo Alvarez landed better punches' is a conclusion. You then have to justify HOW you came to that conclusion. That's what the criteria is.

[Banko Villas]

Okay. So answer these questions then:

1) How did you come to the conclusion that he won more rounds?

2) How did you come to the conclusion that he landed better
punches on Golovkin than vice versa?

3) Do you think Canelo Alvarez inflicted more damage on
Golovkin than vice versa?

You provided me with some of your personal conclusions in regards to the fight. However, you haven't provided the criteria you've used to come to those conclusions. Claiming 'Canelo Alvarez landed better punches' is a conclusion. You then have to justify HOW you came to that conclusion. That's what the criteria is.

Canelo landed more punches. Golovkin missed more punches.
Canelo did more damage. Golovkin did less damage.

[Mr Objecitivity]

Canelo landed more punches. Golovkin missed more punches.
Canelo did more damage. Golovkin did less damage.

1) How did you come to the conclusion that Canelo inflicted more
damage on Golovkin than vice versa?

2) The last time I checked, Golovkin was the one who landed more
overall punches. So I can't agree with that statement. So even if you
disagree with the compubox stats, a punch
count video will be made very soon which'll prove Golovkin was
the one who landed more punches and it'll put this particular
question / debate to bed. Can you do something similar to
prove that Canelo Alvarez landed more punches?

[tRYSIS3]

u should become a comedian.

[Prime 407]

If anything, the big stage got to GGG for the first few rounds but once he adapted to the emotion of the night he became his old self. He was tentative due to hype around Canelo and gave him way more respect than he should have. You watch, in the rematch Canelo gets manhandled.

[Goldie]

It's a boxing forum, race means a lot. Not to me, but it does to the other fans.

While I agree that race is always a factor in boxing and the people who deny this are cowardly and dishonest, you're still playing yourself here. It's ok that you think canelo won but trying to discredit all those who don't agree with you makes you the coward who's dishonest. The fight was very very close. I ageee with you that canelo is the more skilled fighter..........but I had 3G winning because canelo gave too many rounds away. The only rounds that he clearly won were the 9,10,11. THE first 3-4 rounds were close and could've went either way with 3G clearly winning the middle rounds.

Canelo was the better fighter in the middle of the ring but he laid on the ropes too much and 3G was more consistent. If anybody got robbed it was 3G especially wth that ridiculous 118-110 scorecard. I'm fine wth the draw though. Canelo should have the advantage in the rematch seeing how he has such an age advantage and he's the more skilled.

[Banko Villas]

a punch
count video will be made very soon which'll prove Golovkin was
the one who landed more punches and it'll put this particular
question / debate to bed. Can you do something similar to
prove that Canelo Alvarez landed more punches?

I don't need to do something similar. I could merely link you to the fight, not edited, and then you could see for yourself. Come on, man, no way that those few occasional shots from Golovkin racked up to the constant flurry combinations and uppercuts from Canelo.

[Mr Objecitivity]

I don't need to do something similar. I could merely link you to the fight, not edited, and then you could see for yourself. Come on, man, no way that those few occasional shots from Golovkin racked up to the constant flurry combinations and uppercuts from Canelo.

That's not evidence as it's not objective and specific enough. If you can actually demonstrate to me SPECIFICALLY that Canelo Alvarez landed more effective punches than Golovkin in more rounds, then that would be proper evidence.