The Official: " El Chacal" Rigondeaux vs "Hi-Tech" Lomachenko RbR Thread

[LoadedWraps]

Even Lomachenko was complaining about that on a toprank tv interview,Rigo and Loma are correct, the media interest in this fight has been subpar

As Foreman once said, boxing is like jazz, the better it is, the less people appreciate it.

The real fans will be rewarded. I give no chits about the casuals missing out.

[TheUntouchable]

Sounds like you are the one who needs to stop following boxing.

The reason this fight is so appealing is both Rigo and Lomachenko are boxing wizards. They are both complete, high ring IQ fighters who can best you in many ways, and fight successfully in many styles. They have more in common than not.

Toney/Jones is a terrible comparison. Go crawl under your bed and cry.

Are you ready to man up and place a bet then? Or is your bank account as empty as your 'boxing brain'?

[Contra]

You're either illiterate, ******, or a blend of both. Just because one guy is more talented doesn't mean the other can't win based on styles. Are you aware that Salido beat Loma? By your logic, Salido is more talented than Loma.
Now STUF, listen more, and try learning about this shyt.

Salido didn't win because of his style. Did you watch the fight?

If one boxer beats another boxer decisively, then at that point in time, he is the better, more talented fighter.

Slickness, defense, whatever the fùck, doesn't equate to being a more talented fighter. Slicker? Sure. Better defense? Sure. But there are many other dimensions.

Try to learn about this shít...

[Santa_]

Classics

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H3V5V_19fW0

[Redd Foxx]

Salido didn't win because of his style. Did you watch the fight?

If one boxer beats another boxer decisively, then at that point in time, he is the better, more talented fighter.

Slickness, defense, whatever the fùck, doesn't equate to being a more talented fighter. Slicker? Sure. Better defense? Sure. But there are many other dimensions.

Try to learn about this shít...

It's clear that the problem is you not understanding the definition of the word 'talent' in relation to boxing. Talent is not synonymous with victory.
I really don't have any more time to waste arguing with someone who doesn't understand what "Styles make fights" means. This is really basic stuff and you gotta have a grasp on it before you go running your mouth.

[Doctor_Tenma]

My opinion hasn't changed, Rigondeaux too small, Lomachenko will touch him once and finish him soon after, overhyped mismatch is what this is

[juggernaut666]

Salido didn't win because of his style. Did you watch the fight?

If one boxer beats another boxer decisively, then at that point in time, he is the better, more talented fighter.

Slickness, defense, whatever the fùck, doesn't equate to being a more talented fighter. Slicker? Sure. Better defense? Sure. But there are many other dimensions.

Try to learn about this shít...

Salido had every advantage going into the Loma fight ,he was alot heavier ( i dont even think he made weight ? ) He had 50 something PRO fights under him against a ONE fight under him Loma .

I dont even think Salido won the SD win but styles had literally nothing to do with that fight .


Talent doesnt always win , one could be just tougher or stronger or just have one better punch thats more effective than someones full arsenal , etc etc . There is a differance between talent and effectiveness .


Loma 10th round stoppage .

[VG_Addict]

Salido won for three reasons.

1. Experience.
2. Size.
3. Fouling.

And Lomachenko has grown as a fighter since that fight.

[CubanGuyNYC]

Salido won for three reasons.

1. Experience.
2. Size.
3. Fouling.

And Lomachenko has grown as a fighter since that fight.

The Salido fight is always brought up by those that didn’t see it. Lol As with most things in life, you have to look beneath the surface to find the truth.

[Santa_]

Quigg uses his thinking brain and gives his prediction