Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

$80 PPV price for Canelo-Golovkin. What happened to $50 PPVs?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    It's the price that generates the highest amount of income. You might say it's stupid to price it that High but im 99.99% sure the analysis & statistics is used to determine the price. Its all based on calculations. Capitalism 101

    Comment


    • #62
      If you're not that big of a fan, don't buy it.

      Simple as that.

      Comment


      • #63
        Wasn't Ward-Kov I around 70$?
        I bought Ward-Kov I..
        I bought this fight too, good fight needs $ recognition..

        Comment


        • #64
          Originally posted by BoxingFan85 View Post
          Wasn't Ward-Kov I around 70$?
          I bought Ward-Kov I..
          I bought this fight too, good fight needs $ recognition..
          Ward-Kovalev I was $60.

          Comment


          • #65
            Originally posted by Ce1ska View Post
            I usually stream most PPV fights but for one like this I want HD with zero lag.
            I think i'll watch it at the casino on the big screen. Free event, free drinks.

            Same thing I did for Mayweather-McGregor.

            Comment


            • #66
              Originally posted by Pigeons View Post
              Ward-Kovalev I was $60.
              HD or non HD.. ?

              Comment


              • #67
                Originally posted by BoxingFan85 View Post
                HD or non HD.. ?
                HD. I remember they were trumpeting that it was only 49.99, but reporters called them out because most people get it in HD which is 10 more.

                Comment


                • #68
                  Originally posted by Pigeons View Post
                  These prices just keeping getting worse and worse. In the UK they spend $25 MAX for their PPVs. We have to spend 3x that price. I mean I guess this price is a bargain compared to the Mayweather-McGregor exhibition, but it's still ridiculous.
                  Those people that know how to find quality streams, can just run it from their laptop to their flat screen for free. **** paying for an over priced PPV.

                  Comment


                  • #69
                    Originally posted by Pigeons View Post
                    HD. I remember they were trumpeting that it was only 49.99, but reporters called them out because most people get it in HD which is 10 more.
                    No dude.. it was 69.99 I checked my cable bill and the link below also confirms it..

                    The PPV broadcast, which is distributed by HBO, costs $59.99 for standard definition or $69.99 for high definition, though it may vary slightly depending on your cable provider.
                    https://articles.nj.com/sports/index...channel_is.amp

                    Comment


                    • #70
                      Originally posted by BoxingFan85 View Post
                      No dude.. it was 69.99 I checked my cable bill and the link below also confirms it..



                      https://articles.nj.com/sports/index...channel_is.amp
                      You know what, you may be right. I may be confusing it with Cotto-Kirkland.

                      I just looked at my cable bill and I was charged $65. So I guess that brings us to the middle of our price points.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP