IF WOrry About Cards/Corruption? Why Did GGG ABel Want Alvarez?!

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Lester Tutor
    Banned
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • May 2015
    • 17673
    • 365
    • 253
    • 22,224

    #1

    IF WOrry About Cards/Corruption? Why Did GGG ABel Want Alvarez?!

    You can't have it both ways... is it the money or preservation of the record? What about the Jacobs rematch or BJS instead of Alvarez?

    the GGG legacy was to wait for a SWW to then worry about the cards? lol

    How come skeptics create the paradox that if the worry was the cards, then why fight Alvarez in the first place? They could've avoided Alvarez from the beginning and kept on with beating Bhops record and unifying for undisputed with BJS or rematching Jacobs or whoever...

    Ironically, ''GGG Has To KO Alvarez...''

    Therefore, Alvarez can only beat GGG by KO as well?

  • duwdu
    Interim Champion
    Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
    • Dec 2009
    • 635
    • 17
    • 1
    • 6,856

    #2
    Originally posted by Mirko Troll Cop
    You can't have it both ways... is it the money or preservation of the record? What about the Jacobs rematch or BJS instead of Alvarez?

    the GGG legacy was to wait for a SWW to then worry about the cards? lol

    How come skeptics create the paradox that if the worry was the cards, then why fight Alvarez in the first place? They could've avoided Alvarez from the beginning and kept on with beating Bhops record and unifying for undisputed with BJS or rematching Jacobs or whoever...

    Ironically, ''GGG Has To KO Alvarez...''

    Therefore, Alvarez can only beat GGG by KO as well?

    Hopefully, others comprehend this post, but I don't. And it's not just about the logic or grammar... Sorry.

    ........
    P34c3
    .....
    ...

    Comment

    • Dean_Razorback
      God of Thunder and R n' R
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Jan 2013
      • 16559
      • 1,028
      • 396
      • 98,048

      #3
      so you're saying nobody should fight nobody? cool

      Comment

      • ADP02
        Champ
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Apr 2010
        • 13617
        • 415
        • 1
        • 26,360

        #4
        Originally posted by duwdu
        Hopefully, others comprehend this post, but I don't. And it's not just about the logic or grammar... Sorry.

        ........
        P34c3
        .....
        ...


        I'm with you!

        Comment

        • Robbie Barrett
          Banned
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Nov 2013
          • 40891
          • 2,779
          • 667
          • 570,921

          #5
          Originally posted by Dean_Razorback
          so you're saying nobody should fight nobody? cool
          I think he's saying if "all the belts" is Golovkins dream and they believe they'll get robbed, why did he sell his dream for $$$$?

          Comment

          • Mr. 29K
            Banned
            • Oct 2014
            • 3766
            • 302
            • 689
            • 24,424

            #6
            My favorite one is:
            Canelo is a bum, GGG will beat him easily. Canelo ducked him
            If that's the case, then why fight at all? Confused as hell.

            Comment

            • Lester Tutor
              Banned
              Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
              • May 2015
              • 17673
              • 365
              • 253
              • 22,224

              #7

              Comment

              • daggum
                All time great
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Feb 2008
                • 43747
                • 4,677
                • 3
                • 166,270

                #8
                I think he might be saying ggg should have fought saunders instead because his dream was all the belts, but its hard to parse it. Sounds like a trump tweet

                Comment

                Working...
                TOP