Comments Thread For: Parker vs. Fury Referee Will Not Change, Says British Board

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Ray*
    Be safe!!!
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Jul 2005
    • 44867
    • 1,654
    • 1,608
    • 558,890

    #11
    Disgraceful, this are one of the times i feel ashamed to be a brit.

    Comment

    • Ray*
      Be safe!!!
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Jul 2005
      • 44867
      • 1,654
      • 1,608
      • 558,890

      #12
      Originally posted by Mick Higgs
      As far as I'm concerned (& I'm English) All International title bouts be it World, European or Commonwealth ETC should have neutral officials.
      That's the way i feel too. I would be uncomfortable otherwise. But i hope nothing shady happens, especially now that this has been highlighted by Team Parker.

      Comment

      • Tom Cruise
        Co.cktail
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Dec 2007
        • 11442
        • 539
        • 474
        • 39,887

        #13
        I dont mind it being a british ref (how many fights in the US between a yank and a foreigner have an American ref?)

        But Terry O'Connor is a bad choice. Bad ref who often favours the home fighter.

        Comment

        • keith_head
          Interim Champion
          Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
          • Oct 2016
          • 675
          • 57
          • 222
          • 8,355

          #14
          Originally posted by WBC WBA IBF
          No. Sanctioning body rules never override local rules. The local rules are laws set by the government. Sanctioning body rules are voluntary rules being agreed to by the fighters by their own choice.

          Local ref, one local judge and two foreign judges, one of which from the country of the visiting fighter, is a lot better than you'd get in Nevada. Nevada insists on Nevada ref and three Nevada judges.

          The Brit policy is far more fair. Nothing shady here at all. This is standard procedure. If the fighters put in the contract that the ring had to be surrounded by alligators, the local government is under no obligation to humor that.
          Even if I agreed with you on the point, the reality is they've appointed Terry O'connor, who reffed Hughie's last two fights and is an absolute disgrace of a referee. Go and watch the first Tyson Fury vs John McDermott fight and tell me that he should have a career in boxing. He's a disgrace.

          Comment

          • Liondw
            Undisputed Champion
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Oct 2010
            • 5996
            • 1,873
            • 34
            • 23,904

            #15
            Perhaps the issue of debate is more that this british ref is incompetent more than that he's british. Was he the one that stopped first Froch-Groves fight too soon? I saw an old fight, Johnny Nelson vs Carl Thompson, and that fight had a ridiculous early stoppage. These things hurt boxing, and the sport remains watched by few people with the bad pay-per-view model.

            Comment

            • Straightener
              Undisputed Champion
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Apr 2010
              • 4911
              • 427
              • 1,142
              • 41,932

              #16
              Originally posted by Mick Higgs
              As far as I'm concerned (& I'm English) All International title bouts be it World, European or Commonwealth ETC should have neutral officials.
              Im with you on that

              We get enough grief with our s**t officials

              wish it was neutral refs for every fight

              Comment

              • keith_head
                Interim Champion
                Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                • Oct 2016
                • 675
                • 57
                • 222
                • 8,355

                #17
                Yeah I wouldn't care if the ref and all three judges were Hughie's mum, his dad and his dog if I thought they were going to be fair - but this guy has a track record of either incompetence or just plain corruption.

                There's something really dodgy going on with the british board.

                Comment

                • PunchyPotorff
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • Dec 2012
                  • 10384
                  • 525
                  • 1,304
                  • 49,687

                  #18
                  Quote:
                  Originally Posted by PunchyPotorff View Post
                  Except, don't WBO sanctioning body rules override any local rules? Wouldn't that be the logical way to go? As it stands now, seems to me Brit boxing just stepped into a huge steaming illegitimacy dookie pie for evermore. Just my 37 cents worth.

                  Originally posted by WBC WBA IBF
                  No. Sanctioning body rules never override local rules. The local rules are laws set by the government. Sanctioning body rules are voluntary rules being agreed to by the fighters by their own choice.

                  Local ref, one local judge and two foreign judges, one of which from the country of the visiting fighter, is a lot better than you'd get in Nevada. Nevada insists on Nevada ref and three Nevada judges.

                  The Brit policy is far more fair. Nothing shady here at all. This is standard procedure. If the fighters put in the contract that the ring had to be surrounded by alligators, the local government is under no obligation to humor that.
                  Why not? Any promoter knows that throwing the fight loser to the alligators is an excellent way to boost attendance. LOL

                  Comment

                  • TheBigLug
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Jun 2017
                    • 4047
                    • 186
                    • 0
                    • 19,042

                    #19
                    What's the problem?

                    If a foreign fighter goes to fight in USA, the referee will usually be American. What's the difference?

                    Comment

                    • N/A
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                      • Jul 2017
                      • 9269
                      • 214
                      • 0
                      • 12

                      #20
                      Originally posted by PunchyPotorff
                      don't WBO sanctioning body rules override any local rules?
                      Why would they? The local rules are set by the government and are the actual enforceable law of the region.

                      Sanctioning body rules are voluntary rules invented by a company with no actual authority that the fighters have hired to create the illusion that the fight is for some sort of official championship.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP