-
-
i dont think size helped at all. brook was bigger and heavier than golovkin every step of the way and it sure didnt give him an advantage.Originally posted by MexicanStyle#1 View PostComment
-
canelo will win decisively and ggg fans will still find excuses... he is old will be number oneComment
-
First it was Monroe and now it's Brook. Two guys telling people they showed other fighters the blueprint for beating Golovkin.
Next we'll be hearing from Dominic Wade.Comment
-
When he wins Canelo won't be a real middleweight, will have shrunk to 5foot 7,and only good fighter he beat was Trout. Remember this post.Originally posted by Robi13 View PostComment
-
Sunday morning. Canelo was a natural welterweight. He was only five foot 2 with a 3 foot reach. He never beat anyone good. Cotto was old. Chavez weight drained. Floyd beat him. Mcgregor did better than Canelo against Floyd,proving he's a bum. Lara beat him really. And Trout. He got wobbled by Cottos rubbish brother. He got took the distance by Mathew Hatton. Charlo would've knocked him out in half the time. And on it will go.Comment
-
Watch their sparring footage G. was clearly the master but that was a while ago and it was only sparring.
But I think Kell is wrong and although Jacobs and to a degree Kell showed G. is human I still think he will end up busting up and out gunning Canelo.
Beating kirkland , chavez jr., Liam Smith an old near retired Cotto and then a chinny welterweight in Amir Khan does not prepare you for someone like G. If he can stay in there with big hitting huge Jacobs then Canelo will not be a problem .Although Canelo will make it super exciting coming forward,that will be his downfall.Comment
-
Maybe we should listen to Brooks. If one thing is for sure Brooks is an expert on losing. Bet he believes one punch in the eye and GGG will quit since that's what he would do....Comment
-
-
interestingly, most of the UK fighters/trainers seem to back CaneloComment
Tweet
Comment