Comments Thread For: Golovkin's Side Has No Objections to NSAC Officials

[daggum]

Can you at least wait until after the fight??? Most of us can score the fight for ourselves.

When I score fights in close rounds i put a mark next to it so I can go back and review the round in slow motion.

I had Kovalov wining in his 1st Ward fight but had no problem woth Ward getting the decision.

I had GGG beating Jacobs 115-112. I find it a lil hard to see how Jacobs won that fight but I get it. Personally GGG STOLE a few rounds off of late exchanges Jacibs got the WORST of. And if he would of listened to his corner and not engage he probably would of won the fight.

what rounds were those??? i remember jacobs trying to steal rounds like 11 and 12 with late exchanges that he got the better of. still didnt win the round since ggg easily won the first 2 minutes and 45 seconds but i cant remember any that ggg stole.

[Shadoww702]

what rounds were those??? i remember jacobs trying to steal rounds like 11 and 12 with late exchanges that he got the better of. still didnt win the round since ggg easily won the first 2 minutes and 45 seconds but i cant remember any that ggg stole.

I'll have to go back and rewatch it do remember Jacobs boxing and staying on outside and then some reason jumped on the inside for a few seconds and got clocked.

[Vegemil]

Golovkin was in a close fight with Jacobs. Many thought Jacobs won on their cards, was if fair for them to cry robbery because Golovkin got the decision?

Yes and Canelo was 117-111 against Lara.
114-114 against Floyd.
You can't even remotely compare a close fight with Jacobs to that.

[Blond Beast]

I dont see why scoring EVEN rounds is frowned upon? At the same time frowning on 10-8 rounds that don't include a KD? U can win a feeling out round with barely anything happening by a pt? Which is worth the same 1pt if u batter a guy who manages to stay on his feet? It doesnt matter if the judges get the same score in a close fight they hardly ever agree on any rounds. Eye witnesses are unreliable. I feel for UFC fighters. Can dominate one round and then tie or barely lose a round next two rounds and lose.

[Robbie Barrett]

Yes and Canelo was 117-111 against Lara.
114-114 against Floyd.
You can't even remotely compare a close fight with Jacobs to that.

I'm not comparing it to that. I'm just saying fans are going to cry robbery if it's a close fight, whoever wins. This is a FACT. People are mentioning those cards to try and back up their claim of robbery if Canelo gets the nod. So transparent.

[Blond Beast]

I see it being a repeat of the FIGHT OF THE MILLENIUM this time in HD. Nobody wins regardless who gets the nod. Too tactical, too much respect.

Two magnets pushing against eachother as opposed to a positive attraction.

[Dreamking]

Dave And Byrd are suspect Judges.

[j.razor]

Golovkin has no issues but his fans do....LMAO! Let the excuses roll in....

[Eff Pandas]

Thats the thing they never seem like they'll f#ck you til after they f#cked you lol.

The good thing is the judges usually do get the right winner even if the judges scorecards don't make sense to what you just watched. So this concern is just a concern til the decision is announced & its now deemed to have been a legit concern or a unwarranted concern.

This is a concern going into any fight doe idk why people act like its not a concern or its a bigger concern this time, beyond more being up for grabs since its bigger names in a bigger fight.

No one reallllllllly fully trusts the judges I feel & hell a lot of mfers don't even fully trust the refs too.

[Carmen81]

Im pulling for GGG and I genuinely believe he is going to win but I want the true winner to be given the decision im the biggest JC Chavez fan but was outraged when he was give a draw with Whittaker, controversial decisions is what is killing boxing