Comments Thread For: Golovkin's Side Has No Objections to NSAC Officials

[Shadoww702]

Well I've only seen GGG in one close one and IMO it was scored correctly, a close win for him over Jacobs.

Canelo we've seen super wide cards in the Cotto, Trout, and Lara fights and a draw vs Mayweather...

So what I'm saying is no fking ****** cards that don't match what WE see. Not what some blind,corrupt MF'er on the take for GBP

End of the day RTARD the RIGHT boxer won. So grab a tissue and wipe your ****** tears away. I can't STAND seeing grown men cry.

[Shadoww702]

If Golovkin clearly wins and Canelo gets the decision i have no problem with crying robbery. But i know it's going to happen if it's a close fight whoever wins, it happens in every close fight. You saying score it the right way, what is the right way? Is your way the right way? Why is your way superior to everybody else?

That's because you have no problem being fair and honest. That other guy won't accept anything less than a GGG victory. Anything else and he'll scream and cry and throw a bunch of hissy fits.

Mark my words. Remember his name and watch.

[Jsmooth9876]

He is smaller (Just look at them side by side at all the tours stops) but he isn't overrated. Unlike you I still support boxers if they try and fail. You'll be all over Lomachenko nuts if GGG loses and will call him old. And say Canelo waited for him to grow old in 1 year.

Yeah that's exacTry what I'll do lol... I'm already on record on here saying I don't even care who wins. I'm rooting for GGG but if Canelo wins its proably better for boxing because he's younger and has more options after this fight.

What I don't want is boxing to kick itself in the balls as it usually does and have some kind of controversy with a terrible decision because some fk on the take scores a 9-3 fight a draw or something. I've seen Canelo on the good side of a few of these cards already is all I'm saying..if you and that other spaz don't want to see what's clearly in front of you then that's your problem, not mine.

[Jsmooth9876]

That's because you have no problem being fair and honest. That other guy won't accept anything less than a GGG victory. Anything else and he'll scream and cry and throw a bunch of hissy fits.

Mark my words. Remember his name and watch.

Right, because judging by all his posts about GGG, he's clearly non biased lol 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

[Shadoww702]

Yeah that's exacTry what I'll do lol... I'm already on record on here saying I don't even care who wins. I'm rooting for GGG but if Canelo wins its proably better for boxing because he's younger and has more options after this fight.

What I don't want is boxing to kick itself in the balls as it usually does and have some kind of controversy with a terrible decision because some fk on the take scores a 9-3 fight a draw or something. I've seen Canelo on the good side of a few of these cards already is all I'm saying..if you and that other spaz don't want to see what's clearly in front of you then that's your problem, not mine.

Can you at least wait until after the fight??? Most of us can score the fight for ourselves.

When I score fights in close rounds i put a mark next to it so I can go back and review the round in slow motion.

I had Kovalov wining in his 1st Ward fight but had no problem woth Ward getting the decision.

I had GGG beating Jacobs 115-112. I find it a lil hard to see how Jacobs won that fight but I get it. Personally GGG STOLE a few rounds off of late exchanges Jacibs got the WORST of. And if he would of listened to his corner and not engage he probably would of won the fight.

[Shadoww702]

I dont want to see a robbery as well. But if we get a lot of close rounds that a hard to score no one should call robbery.

Everyone use to say the same damn thing about Oscar. Actually even more so than Canelo. Why he was the GOLDEN BOY. But he LOST close decisions to Trinidad, Mosley x2. And he won some as well.

EVERY boxer has some cards go their way...Floyd also.

[Shadoww702]

Right, because judging by all his posts about GGG, he's clearly non biased lol 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

What do I say bad about GGG???

On on record not even betting on a winner but taking the over. And calling it a SD or MD without even saying who gets the nod.

[Robbie Barrett]

Right, because judging by all his posts about GGG, he's clearly non biased lol 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

Not when it comes to scoring fights. I didn't cry robbery when Golovkin got the decision over Jacobs. I said it was a close fight that could have gone either way.

[JK1700]

They will after the fight, LOL!

[Jsmooth9876]

What do I say bad about GGG???

On on record not even betting on a winner but taking the over. And calling it a SD or MD without even saying who gets the nod.

Not you........