If you could change the weight classes, how would you do it?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Golden Boi 360
    Boxing's Biggest Cash Cow
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • May 2010
    • 5724
    • 402
    • 318
    • 86,855

    #1

    If you could change the weight classes, how would you do it?

    Current classes: Which ones would you get rid of?

    105
    108
    112
    115
    118
    122
    126
    130
    135
    140
    147
    154
    160
    168
    175
    200-
    200+
  • jmrf4435
    Undisputed Champion
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Jun 2014
    • 8397
    • 772
    • 14
    • 66,112

    #2
    I'd prob get rid of everything below like 118, then I would prob institute a rule not ever letting anyone fight at 154, FOR ANY REASON< AGREEMENT OR ANYTHING.

    I think it strips 147 guys and 160 of opportunity in a complex way. Look at how cotto hijacked that belt for a while, knoing he'd get steam rolled by a natural 160 guy at 160.

    Floys also used 154 pretty intelligently. i think everyone at 154 should be fighting 160............................................... ....................LAra all those guys

    Comment

    • j0zef
      Undisputed Champion
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Oct 2015
      • 8440
      • 645
      • 767
      • 45,501

      #3
      I would have:
      115 Bantamweight
      125 Featherweight
      135 Lightweight
      147 Welterweight
      160 Middleweight
      175 Light Heavy
      200 Heavy

      Less divisions is better competition. Bigger differences in weight means less weight games will be played by fighters.

      I'd also enforce fight night rehydration limit of 10% of bodyweight. And I mean FIGHT NIGHT, not the morning of, or 'due to scheduling the day before'. You arrive at the arena, you relax, and an hour before the fight you get weighed.
      Last edited by j0zef; 09-11-2017, 10:18 PM.

      Comment

      • Pigeons
        Banned
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Jun 2013
        • 14750
        • 1,211
        • 714
        • 37,430

        #4
        Go with 10, round and even.

        Straw
        Fly
        Bantam
        Feather
        Light
        Welter
        Middle
        Light Heavy
        Cruiser
        Heavy

        Comment

        • BrometheusBob.
          All Time Great
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Apr 2015
          • 20464
          • 922
          • 1,922
          • 156,555

          #5
          I would poll the fighters and see what they think before I could make a decision like that.

          But I'll say this, there aren't any divisions I'm inclined to remove.

          Originally posted by j0zef
          I would have:
          115 Bantamweight
          125 Featherweight
          135 Lightweight
          147 Welterweight
          160 Middleweight
          175 Light Heavy
          200 Heavy
          Eh, big gap between LH and H seems unrealistic given how big some of these guys get. If anything, there needs to be a super heavyweight division.

          Plus you're putting all them strawweights out of work. They might not make headlines here in the west, but boxing fans in the east may feel differently.

          Comment

          • Eff Pandas
            Banned
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Apr 2012
            • 52129
            • 3,624
            • 2,147
            • 1,635,919

            #6
            Originally posted by Golden Boi 360
            Current classes: Which ones would you get rid of?

            105
            108
            112
            115
            118
            122
            126 125
            130
            135 135
            140
            147 145
            154 155
            160
            168 170
            175 185
            200- 205
            200+ 265
            I'd kill them all & start over with MMA weight divisions which are more reasonable to me & kills a lot of the bs lil guy divisions. Still crazy to me 105-135 (30lbs) covers 9 f#cking divisions of the 17. I'd also like to see HW have a limit like in MMA & there is a super hw division, but its a freak show & largely anyone over 265 is a freak show.

            Comment

            • BrometheusBob.
              All Time Great
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Apr 2015
              • 20464
              • 922
              • 1,922
              • 156,555

              #7
              Originally posted by Eff Pandas
              I'd kill them all & start over with MMA weight divisions which are more reasonable to me & kills a lot of the bs lil guy divisions. Still crazy to me 105-135 (30lbs) covers 9 f#cking divisions of the 17. I'd also like to see HW have a limit like in MMA & there is a super hw division, but its a freak show & largely anyone over 265 is a freak show.
              But what will be the difference to you if you removed the 'bs lil guy divisions'? What benefit will you get out of there being a smaller number of divisions, and what number of divisions are ideal (and why)?

              I don't really get why people care so much about how many divisions there are.

              Comment

              • .!WAR MIKEY!.
                Banned
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Aug 2015
                • 23780
                • 889
                • 769
                • 309,182

                #8
                Ill group weight classes togther and have them battle it out in the ring royal rumble and whoever wins keeps their division.

                Comment

                • Eff Pandas
                  Banned
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Apr 2012
                  • 52129
                  • 3,624
                  • 2,147
                  • 1,635,919

                  #9
                  Originally posted by BrometheusBob.
                  But what will be the difference to you if you removed the 'bs lil guy divisions'? What benefit will you get out of there being a smaller number of divisions, and what number of divisions are ideal (and why)?

                  I don't really get why people care so much about how many divisions there are.
                  The lil guy divisions hold lil appeal to most fans. There are virtually never unification fights in those divisions cuz there is no money cuz no one cares.

                  I think boxing is better with less bs divisions few care about. I think boxing would be better if people could actually name all the champions like in the old days. Boxing is so confusing with so many weight divisions + so many titles.

                  Comment

                  • Golden Boi 360
                    Boxing's Biggest Cash Cow
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • May 2010
                    • 5724
                    • 402
                    • 318
                    • 86,855

                    #10
                    Originally posted by BrometheusBob.
                    But what will be the difference to you if you removed the 'bs lil guy divisions'? What benefit will you get out of there being a smaller number of divisions, and what number of divisions are ideal (and why)?

                    I don't really get why people care so much about how many divisions there are.
                    I think it has something to do with remembering who the champs are. There's so many divisions and belts you can't keep track of everyone.

                    Getting rid of 3-5 divisions would help. It would also make becoming a world champ a little harder which makes the accomplishment that much more impressive.

                    However, I wouldn't get rid of all the little divisions like the the guy above me is suggesting. Those little guys deserve a chance at glory as well.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP