Selecting Referee and Judges

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • juandabomb
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Dec 2005
    • 2629
    • 107
    • 0
    • 21,659

    #1

    Selecting Referee and Judges

    They should select the referees and judges for all fights the day of the fight. they already have a pool of judges and refs on hand to do this. this will avoid anyone from being wined and dined days before the fight. simply draw the names from a pool..... anyone else have a better idea???
  • Robbie Barrett
    Banned
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Nov 2013
    • 40891
    • 2,779
    • 667
    • 570,921

    #2
    That would mean all judges and referees having to travel to the fight. Impossible.

    Comment

    • juandabomb
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Dec 2005
      • 2629
      • 107
      • 0
      • 21,659

      #3
      Originally posted by Robbie Barrett
      That would mean all judges and referees having to travel to the fight. Impossible.
      in vegas its always the same judges and refs, they live in vegas...same goes for the ones in the new york area.

      Comment

      • Lester Tutor
        Banned
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • May 2015
        • 17673
        • 365
        • 253
        • 22,224

        #4
        Originally posted by juandabomb
        in vegas its always the same judges and refs, they live in vegas...same goes for the ones in the new york area.
        don't over exaggerate protocol just for one fight ffs...

        if anything, reserve your idea for rigondeaux vs lomachenko.

        besides, you want judges with particular experience in title fights. many people on the board have justified scenarios from how the judges may have scored before, of course all subjective but moreso reasonable.

        Comment

        • daggum
          All time great
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Feb 2008
          • 43683
          • 4,650
          • 3
          • 166,270

          #5
          the problem is the pool of judges/refs that they have have to pick from have been corrupted...and thats the way they want it. you dont get these positions unless you know where your bread is buttered. tony weeks should have been sacked for his performance in the garcia/matthysse fight but he was actually promoted! kenny bayless for his performance in the 2nd maidana fight...but he was promoted to the biggest fight of all time. this is no coincidence. if you help get the desired result. you will be back in action.

          Comment

          • Motorcity Cobra
            Banned
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Mar 2016
            • 32565
            • 1,106
            • 545
            • 963,610

            #6
            Originally posted by juandabomb
            They should select the referees and judges for all fights the day of the fight. they already have a pool of judges and refs on hand to do this. this will avoid anyone from being wined and dined days before the fight. simply draw the names from a pool..... anyone else have a better idea???
            Good idea but by doing that they're admitting there's a good possibility their judges can be corrupted.

            Comment

            • Lester Tutor
              Banned
              Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
              • May 2015
              • 17673
              • 365
              • 253
              • 22,224

              #7
              Originally posted by Motorcity Cobra
              Good idea but by doing that they're admitting there's a good possibility their judges can be corrupted.
              The sport is what it is. I watched Floyd vs Alvarez last night again, and people exaggerate the bout. Alvarez is really really good and he was catching Floyd at close range where other opponents couldn't. he was younger and at 152. If CJ Ross never had scored Bradley vs Pac 1, nobody would care for the 114-114. Alvarez started out really good. The kid is fast as foook, but I'm a Floyd fan full swing, just giving credit where it's due

              speaking of which, I see Nelo and his strategy well preped for GGG. Mayweather was a completely different fight and expectation

              Comment

              • Motorcity Cobra
                Banned
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Mar 2016
                • 32565
                • 1,106
                • 545
                • 963,610

                #8
                Originally posted by Mirko Troll Cop
                The sport is what it is. I watched Floyd vs Alvarez last night again, and people exaggerate the bout. Alvarez is really really good and he was catching Floyd at close range where other opponents couldn't. he was younger and at 152. If CJ Ross never had scored Bradley vs Pac 1, nobody would care for the 114-114. Alvarez started out really good. The kid is fast as foook, but I'm a Floyd fan full swing, just giving credit where it's due

                speaking of which, I see Nelo and his strategy well preped for GGG. Mayweather was a completely different fight and expectation
                Everyone would complain about that 114-114 card no matter who scored it that way. Because it was CJ Ross it was the last straw for her.

                Comment

                • Eff Pandas
                  Banned
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Apr 2012
                  • 52129
                  • 3,624
                  • 2,147
                  • 1,635,919

                  #9
                  LOL would be hilarious seeing a bunch of refs & judges outside of T-Mobile like guys looking for work in the great depression.

                  Yea idk about that idea. Idk how you police refs & judges realllllly outside of after the fact. You move up the good ones & move down the bad ones. And idk that they don't do that to some degree already, but idk if they do it to the degree they could.

                  I think one underrated thing that would help get rid of bad judges is to make the criteria for winning a round less subjective. Now you can pretty much favor anything you want, within reason, & give a guy a round without getting commissions panties in a bunch. If it was less arguable what won a round & people couldn't explain that xyz won the round for a guy cuz everyone could see it it'drop that judge down to lesser fights easier & out of the sport completely if it kept being a problem.

                  Comment

                  • Lester Tutor
                    Banned
                    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                    • May 2015
                    • 17673
                    • 365
                    • 253
                    • 22,224

                    #10
                    Originally posted by Motorcity Cobra
                    Everyone would complain about that 114-114 card no matter who scored it that way. Because it was CJ Ross it was the last straw for her.
                    Yeah but the Pacquiao Bradley 1 incident is what started it for MayNelo

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP