For sure no one was beaten badly in this fight. I do think Jacobs is worthy of a rematch, I just hope he doesn't sit around waiting for it because I also think Golovkin has some justified fights before that (possible Canelo rematch and unification vs. Saunders/Monroe winner).
Post your honest objective scorecard for GGGvsJacobs
Collapse
-
-
You made a claim fool, now back it up. You said HBO scored it 115-113 for Jacobs. Here are you exact words:
"Hell even HBO thought Jabobs won
115-113 = HBO thought Jacobs won"
I told you Lederman had it for Golovkin, so where's your source about HBO?
Unless you retract what you stated or you provide a link you've been exposed as a fraud and a liar.
I don't mind a disagreement but people who knowingly lie have no credibility. I didn't even say you were wrong about HBO I simply said provide your source. Otherwise sit the f down clown.
This is common sense.
HBO knew the Canelo fight was in the horizon as they were announcing for years leading up to the Jacobs fight and you mean to tell me they can only find G winning by ONE round after this? One round?
How ******ed can one be to not know HBO thought he lost the fight?Comment
-
HBO having it by 1 round for THEIR guy against an Al Haymon SHOWTIME fighter means Jacobs won and they know it.
This is common sense.
HBO knew the Canelo fight was in the horizon as they were announcing for years leading up to the Jacobs fight and you mean to tell me they can only find G winning by ONE round after this? One round?
How ******ed can one be to not know HBO thought he lost the fight?
"Hell even HBO thought Jabobs won
115-113 = HBO thought Jacobs won"
This isn't common sense, either provide the link or say you were wrong. The rest of what you are writing is BS.Comment
-
That's not what you said fool, and the fact you simply can't say you were wrong says it all about you. We all make mistakes, how we handle it shows your character or lack of it.
"Hell even HBO thought Jabobs won
115-113 = HBO thought Jacobs won"
This isn't common sense, either provide the link or say you were wrong. The rest of what you are writing is BS.
HBO having 115-113 for Golovkin=Jacobs won
What don't you understand about that?Last edited by Chollo Vista; 09-13-2017, 11:18 AM.Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
Of course they didn't have it 115-113 for Golovkin because no one should have that score if they know how to score a fight correctly. There was a two point round. Lederman's card was 114-113 for Golovkin.Comment
-
Yeah I didn't understand your ******ed English. Now you've thrown in HBO having it 115-113 for GOLOVKIN, which means they really think Jacobs won. Okay I got it now.
Of course they didn't have it 115-113 for Golovkin because no one should have that score if they know how to score a fight correctly. There was a two point round. Lederman's card was 114-113 for Golovkin.
Stop deflecting and face reality.
The reality is Jacobs was an Al Haymon/SHOWTIME fighter that went to HBO and fought their biggest star outside Canelo and all HBO could score was a 1 point win for THEIR guy?
Golovkin lost the fight. HBO, boxers, fans and NSB posters know
Sit your ass downComment
-
You know what I mean, idiot. 115-113/114-113
Stop deflecting and face reality.
The reality is Jacobs was an Al Haymon/SHOWTIME fighter that went to HBO and fought their biggest star outside Canelo and all HBO could score was a 1 point win for THEIR guy?
Golovkin lost the fight. HBO, boxers, fans and NSB posters know
Sit your ass downComment
Comment