And Cottos resume is PPV worthy, please. Cotto will likly KO Paulie, but neither is PPV worthy. Lets be completly honest here, Cotto is hyped up abit, people are hoping he will be the next Tito.
This is whats wrong with boxing, they put fighters on PPV that haven't proved themselves on standard premium channels. IMO PPV should be reserved for fighters that have both proven themselves and consistently put on good shows like Pac Vs. Barrera, not Paulie vs. Cotto, come on.
I think Cotto is worthy enough to be on PPV's but is not proven enough to carry a PPV all by himself versus a nobody. Examples: Cotto fighting another name fighter Hatton, Castillo, Corrales, Zab, Mayweather, Margarito are all PPV worthy fights because Cotto brings enough to the table. If any of those other fighters were fighting Paulie I wouldn't want it on PPV either.
So IMHO its not that Cotto is not worth the PPV its who he is facing.
Comment