Arreola thinks Wilder is the best heavyweight, but the The proof of the pudding is in the eating. That's not a joke about Arreola's appetite, it's a jab at Wilder's record. He might be the best, but the names on his resume don't really speak of greatness. Wilder may very well be able to beat Joshua, but Joshua has arguably beaten better opponents than Wilder.
Comments Thread For: Arreola: Wilder is The Best at Heavyweight, He Beats Joshua
Collapse
-
-
He Said it felt like Vitali wanted to kill you...lol...Vitali was a mean dudeLast edited by Larry the boss; 09-03-2017, 06:33 PM.Comment
-
Mike Tyson said Joshua was the more complete boxer and that Wilder was not ready for him. Klitschko said a couple of years ago that the only guy he saw as his successor in the future was Joshua. Ortiz said Povetkin would beat Wilder.
I think Tyson, Klitschko and Ortiz know "a little bit" more about boxing than Arreola.Comment
-
Lolol.. Thing of beauty lmao what's this guy on? When he let's his hands go it looks absolutely awful, far from a thing of beauty but it is a thing of destructive power.. Just not clean, slick boxing.
Plus he hasn't ever met AJ let alone boxed him so his opinion is as holds as much weight as me saying AJ will win. Molina said Wilder vs AJ is close fight right now but he believes AJ is getting better with each fight whereas Wilder isn't so be feels AJ will win.Last edited by NahMean; 09-03-2017, 06:57 PM.Comment
-
Arreola wasn't going to say anything else - any discredit towards Wilder is a discredit towards himself.Comment
-
Better than Wilder why cause you say so. There's one or two guys that can fight and the rest are average or on the same level. Everyone was calling Molina a bum when Wilder beat him now that's supposed to be some great victory. And are Whyte and Breazelle really much better than Washington? I don't think so.Joshua isn't ducking you're a Wilder apologist who out of laziness or shear ignorance will blatantly ignore and cherry pick information to suit the pro Wilder agenda. Who has Joshua beat? Well in 19 fights Whyte, Molina, Breazeale and Klitschko. That right there is better than Wilder's resume. Who has Wilder beat in nearly 40 fights? 40! Even better who did Wilder beat in his first 20 fights? As for how long someone is champ that is insignificant if they don't fight anyone good. Just look at the chumps Wilder has defended against it doesn't matter if he fights the Arreola's and Duhaupa's of the division for 10 years because they're not good any top 10 fighter can do what Wilder is doing!
The importance of quality over quantity is something Wilder and his fans can't or simply just refuse to acknowledge. How embarrassingComment
-
We already know this Chris. One wants to fight, and the other wants to fight his obligated mandatories, lmao. Now Wlad has retired, Pulev needs 4 months and Ortiz knows that Hearn is scared for Joshua and wants Joshua stripped so that he can unify the titles with Wilder. We already knew this Chris. Joshua's new last name is Anthony Mandatory.Comment
-
-
The sad thing is that I believe Tyson Fury easily beats both Wilder and Joshua. They're not even the real champions in my eyes...Tyson didn't lose his belt in the ring.Comment
-
With that being said by Chris I would have to see them fight. It's still a fairly even fight my book. I would favor wilder slightly in the fight. A year ago I would have said Anthony Joshua easy money. But now I lean towards Wilder because I think Wilder can take AJ power better than AJ can take Wilder's power. At any rate I just want to see them fight to take the guess work out of it lolComment

Comment