So is GGG still short work ?

[Metho_4u]

Corky, I know you are probably still trying to get a GED but what you are stating is simply an opinion not a truth. Everything you are spouting off is simply your opinion. That's fine. Every fool is entitled to one.

Good luck Corky on passing the GED this time. You aren't the sharpest tool in the shed but with a little more effort I'm sure you'll pass on this 10th retake.

Lol, stop acting like you know what you're talking about because you want to lick the guys anus.

If It's an opinion, it's one that most here know (again, except somehow this slipped passed you) that the guys he's beaten were either complete bums or shot.

[Metho_4u]

So who should GGG fight?

Obviously nobody with fanboys like you tasting his taint.

[Diego Rodriguez]

Lol, stop acting like you know what you're talking about because you want to lick the guys anus.

If It's an opinion, it's one that most here know (again, except somehow this slipped passed you) that the guys he's beaten were either complete bums or shot.

I like that your responding to Corky . . . . life does indeed go on Corky.

Corky, it isn't an "IF" it IS an opinion. Oh Corky you try so hard but fail so miserably.

Remember Corky, when the math problem comes up on the GED test and it is 2+2 = ?, the answer is not 5. If I've told you once I've told you a million times Corkster.

But have a happy Labor Day weekend Corky.

[Metho_4u]

I like that your responding to Corky . . . . life does indeed go on Corky.

Corky, it isn't an "IF" it IS an opinion. Oh Corky you try so hard but fail so miserably.

Remember Corky, when the math problem comes up on the GED test and it is 2+2 = ?, the answer is not 5. If I've told you once I've told you a million times Corkster.

But have a happy Labor Day weekend Corky.

Lol, I'm responding to your utter ignorance and nonsense in which you have to resort to personal attacks rather than logic...how long have you even been watching this sport? Apparently not long enough to spot a hype job vs a legit fighter with a chance at greatness... I realize it's easier to attempt to be witty than it is to attempt to debate your point. You know that there's no way to defend golovkins resume vs any of the other top REAL p4p fighters out there. To your credit, you have agreed that is resume is just ok. Had golovkin moved up and actually tested himself at 168 vs Ward, Jack, DeGale, even if he lost, I would give him credit for trying. Instead he stayed in no man's land where the competition was limited. Jacobs being the only real decent fighter there, quillen had been ko'd in a single rd and imo has lost a few times, Saunders is a chump who doesn't want to come here to fight, and isn't that great anyway. Jacobs was an 8-1 underdog that everyone here was saying would be Ko'd, and then golovkin barely gets by him. That's a B level fighter in a division that was loaded....



















With C and D level fighters.

[Diego Rodriguez]

Lol, I'm responding to your utter ignorance and nonsense in which you have to resort to personal attacks rather than logic...how long have you even been watching this sport? Apparently not long enough to spot a hype job vs a legit fighter with a chance at greatness... I realize it's easier to attempt to be witty than it is to attempt to debate your point. You know that there's no way to defend golovkins resume vs any of the other top REAL p4p fighters out there. To your credit, you have agreed that is resume is just ok. Had golovkin moved up and actually tested himself at 168 vs Ward, Jack, DeGale, even if he lost, I would give him credit for trying. Instead he stayed in no man's land where the competition was limited. Jacobs being the only real decent fighter there, quillen had been ko'd in a single rd and imo has lost a few times, Saunders is a chump who doesn't want to come here to fight, and isn't that great anyway. Jacobs was an 8-1 underdog that everyone here was saying would be Ko'd, and then golovkin barely gets by him. That's a B level fighter in a division that was loaded....



















With C and D level fighters.

Corky I've been more than patient with you. I've given you logical arguments.

Here's a clue moron; when someone cries and whines and screams hype job hype job that isn't a balanced person. That is person being an emotional btch. When someone screams he fights C and D level fighters that isn't a person who is interested in a rationale discussion. Golovkin puts you in a hissy fit.

The whole point about Hopkins and Halgar was to counter your argument about Golovkin needing to move up. I showed you how Hopkins career paralleled Golovkin up to the Tito fight. After several post I think you finally understood the argument which was pretty easy to understand the first time. My point about Haglar was, he never moved up. That was all.

I personally don't care who YOU deem as B, C or D level fighters. I have no respect for your opinion as demonstrated by what I've seen here. You would have been the same clown screaming at Hopkins prior to his fight with Tito that he was a hype job. He had only beat B, C and D level fighters. He didn't beat anyone, blah blah blah. GTFO, you don't have a clue. You'll be whining like a pssy IF Golovkin KO's Canelo, KO's Saunders, KO's Charlo and then KO's Jacobs in a rematch. You'll continue to cry because that's what haters do. Again you're a f'n loser.

There really isn't any left to say but you seem to be sadistic and love getting your butt whipped. So I'm sure you aren't done.

[Metho_4u]

Corky I've been more than patient with you. I've given you logical arguments.

Here's a clue moron; when someone cries and whines and screams hype job hype job that isn't a balanced person. That is person being an emotional btch. When someone screams he fights C and D level fighters that isn't a person who is interested in a rationale discussion. Golovkin puts you in a hissy fit.

The whole point about Hopkins and Halgar was to counter your argument about Golovkin needing to move up. I showed you how Hopkins career paralleled Golovkin up to the Tito fight. After several post I think you finally understood the argument which was pretty easy to understand the first time. My point about Haglar was, he never moved up. That was all.

I personally don't care who YOU deem as B, C or D level fighters. I have no respect for your opinion as demonstrated by what I've seen here. You would have been the same clown screaming at Hopkins prior to his fight with Tito that he was a hype job. He had only beat B, C and D level fighters. He didn't beat anyone, blah blah blah. GTFO, you don't have a clue. You'll be whining like a pssy IF Golovkin KO's Canelo, KO's Saunders, KO's Charlo and then KO's Jacobs in a rematch. You'll continue to cry because that's what haters do. Again you're a f'n loser.

There really isn't any left to say but you seem to be sadistic and love getting your butt whipped. So I'm sure you aren't done.

Your mom sure does.

Oh, and you never proved **** either, you tried to make a comparison that made you look ****ing ******...i guess you're just ****ing ******? All I can think of.

[Diego Rodriguez]

Your mom sure does.

Oh, and you never proved **** either, you tried to make a comparison that made you look ****ing ******...i guess you're just ****ing ******? All I can think of.

LMAO bringing in my dead momma. LOL!

Yes that's right I made a comparison. And you actually never countered my comparison. First you covered your ears, jumped up and down like a kid having a tantrum saying you don't want to talk about Hopkins (and then you made an argument BTW using that same guy you said you didn't want to talk about).

Then you didn't understand I wasn't comparing Hops entire career I was specifically referring to his career up to the Tito fight and what happened after. You then started on Hops and prison and some other BS and how I couldn't compare him to Golovkin, of course that had no bearing what so ever on how Hops compared to Golovkin before their biggest fight. Then after I slapped you around again I thought you finally understood, but probably not.

Okay Corky have a good one. I actually feel bad picking on you, I mean I know I'm going to hell when I'm picking on Corky.

[stealthradon]

Obviously nobody with fanboys like you tasting his taint.

Answer my question. Who, according to you, should GGG fight to be near Hopkins level?

[redmyth79]

Wow! So golovkin needs to fight an elite before he moves up? You realize you just admitted he has ZERO elite fighters on his resume right?

Why has he mentioned retirement after the canelo fight? Why has he made a career fighting C level fighters and then people like you jump ALLLLLL over his jock? You're blinded by his nutsack in your face, and HBO praising his every pathetic win.

He is a LIAR! 154-168 means...only 160 because it's between them lol the guys a pathetic hype job.

Ward isn't a draw? Mr 97k is though? IF this ppv does well...it won't be because of golovkin you moron.

Dude you have some serious issues. For 1 im not a nut hugger like your ***** azz!! I like GGG but he does not have a HOF resume. I call it how it is with any fighter by calling facts not BS talking out my azz like you!!
Is GGG a very good fighter, your damn right. 350 amateur wins with 5 loses and 37 pro is nothing to frawn on. And back to me saying something on Hopkins. Everybody thought he was nothing till he beat Tito. Again know your facts before you talk ****!!

[Metho_4u]

Dude you have some serious issues. For 1 im not a nut hugger like your ***** azz!! I like GGG but he does not have a HOF resume. I call it how it is with any fighter by calling facts not BS talking out my azz like you!!
Is GGG a very good fighter, your damn right. 350 amateur wins with 5 loses and 37 pro is nothing to frawn on. And back to me saying something on Hopkins. Everybody thought he was nothing till he beat Tito. Again know your facts before you talk ****!!

Oh I know my facts...especially the hype job...you know he's 1-1 with dirrell right? Think he'd fight him in the pros though? You'd think so...but nope.

Oh, and you want to talk facts asswipe? http://amateur-boxing.strefa.pl/Records/Golovkin_Gennadiy.html he has AT LEAST 8 losses.