Yes, I dispute both claims. The only rounds that I could see conceivably going to him are by default because Floyd wasn't throwing. That's rounds 1-2. He didn't clearly win any rounds so yes, saying he won 4-5 is ridiculous and obviously biased. That's counting every round that Floyd didn't clearly dominate as a round for mcgregor.
Comments Thread For: Floyd Mayweather Stops Conor McGregor in The Tenth
Collapse
-
Yes, I dispute both claims. The only rounds that I could see conceivably going to him are by default because Floyd wasn't throwing. That's rounds 1-2. He didn't clearly win any rounds so yes, saying he won 4-5 is ridiculous and obviously biased. That's counting every round that Floyd didn't clearly dominate as a round for mcgregor.
Conor out threw and out landed Floyd in each of the first 3 rounds. Floyd threw, Floyd hit air and landed very little in those rounds while being effectively countered.Comment
-
If he "won" them it wasn't by some great display of boxing technique. And it doesn't really matter because he lost the fight before it really started. There was no real good boxingComment
-
Comment
-
You don't just judge rounds just by who threw and landed more. That's an incredibly simpleminded way of trying to judge a fight. There's this part of boxing called "defense" that you might want to introduce yourself to. Floyd explained his plan before and after the fight. He intentionally allowed mcgregor to get shots off early to expend his energy so that he could exploit his fatigue in the later rounds. Mcgregor landed 1 shot of note in the first 3 rounds which was that clean counter uppercut which Floyd walked right through. Those other punches counted as being landed during the those rounds were insignificant. Floyd dictated from start to finish.Last edited by Goldie; 08-28-2017, 04:05 PM.Comment
-
Floyd was 12/28 during the first 3 rounds while mcgregor was 26/115. So if anyone was swinging at air during those rounds it was mcgregor. You're trying to be cute and insult me when you're evidently too ****** to do simple math. Plus 2 of the 3 judges had mcgregor winning just 1 round so I'm no the 1 biased here.
You don't just judge rounds just by who threw and landed more. That's an incredibly simpleminded way of trying to judge a fight. There's this part of boxing called "defense" that you might want to introduce yourself to. Floyd explained his plan before and after the fight. He intentionally allowed mcgregor to get shots off early to expend his energy so that he could exploit his fatigue in the later rounds. Mcgregor landed 1 shot of note in the first 3 rounds which was that clean counter uppercut which Floyd walked right through. Those other punches counted as being landed during the those rounds were insignificant. Floyd dictated from start to finish.
The result was the same as it was always going to be but don't lie to yourself and say Conor didn't win rounds.
Pathetic!!!!Comment
-
I'm certainly not delusional my friend. It sounds like you're having a hard time accepting that the guy you wanted to win lost and lost badly. If Floyd was being outboxed he wouldn't have been there laughing and giggling like someone was tickling him. If you have access to a replay of these round you say Connor won please rewatch them. Ask yourself have you ever seen a quality boxer throw punches like that. No snap. Pure arm punching no transfer of energy. If your goal is to highlight moments of being outboxed in Floyd's career you can pick other fights to choose from and be perfectly correct. This just isn't one of themComment
-
Bahahaha! That's precisely how a fight is judged you twit! I don't need to respond anymore here you've already shown what an absolute idiot puke you are.
The result was the same as it was always going to be but don't lie to yourself and say Conor didn't win rounds.
Pathetic!!!!Comment
-
That entire event was pai, except for the part of Foyd being out boxed
Mcregor won the first 4-5 runds, money may didn't throw ****!!Comment
Comment